Operation Anaconda Revisited
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The paper relates that the lessons of Operation Anaconda are many. The paper discusses how the harsh terrain provided unprecedented learning experiences for U.S. forces working in extreme conditions, but also showed the limitations of technology as well as the lethal confusion that can result from an ambiguous chain of command. The paper asserts that the main lesson of the Operation may be that there can be no substitute for experienced personnel on the ground working in coordination with proven leadership, maintaining flexibility to deal instantly with changing local conditions as they arise.
From the Paper:"How well or badly did the various intelligence organizations involved in Afghanistan blend together from a tactical standpoint? First of all, it should be noted that CENTCOM commander Gen. Tommy Franks was committed to Defense Secretary Rumsfeld's strategic goal of minimizing the total number of troops in the field. Naylor indicates that Rumsfeld "scrutinized" every request for forces (Naylor 2005, 56); as a result, forces in Afghanistan found themselves working with considerably reduced assets on every level due to the high command's reluctance to commit large numbers to the theater (131). One consequence of this asset limitation was..."
Cite this Term Paper:
Operation Anaconda Revisited (2007, December 01) Retrieved February 23, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/term-paper/operation-anaconda-revisited-135185/
"Operation Anaconda Revisited" 01 December 2007. Web. 23 February. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/term-paper/operation-anaconda-revisited-135185/>