Corporations Versus Freedom of Speech Term Paper

Corporations Versus Freedom of Speech
A discussion on whether corporations have the right to violate an individual's right to freedom of speech.
# 153723 | 1,605 words | 6 sources | MLA | 2013 | US
Published on Nov 18, 2013 in Business (Law) , Political Science (U.S.) , Law (Constitution)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

The paper looks at a definition of freedom of speech and censorship, and explores whether corporations violate the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and are guilty of censorship. The paper discusses the instances where corporations may implicitly or explicitly violate an individual's right to freedom of speech, and draws the conclusion that despite the negative connotations of violating freedom of speech and using censorship, it may be necessary given the proper circumstances. Furthermore, the paper suggests that the First Amendment may need to be changed with additional legislation.

From the Paper:

"Our country was built on solid principles. These principles have managed to withstand the test of time. The journey definitely included several hurdles along the way. The founding principles are outlined within the United States Constitution. This document grants the inhabitants of this nation specific rights. Over the years these rights have provided issues in maintaining progress. Due to this, several altercations have become necessary. An exemplification of this may be rendered by observing the very First Amendment of the United States Constitution. This amendment provides everyone the right to freedom of speech. Throughout the course of time there have been numerous contestants to this right. One of the most obvious contenders are corporations. Corporations are allowed to violate an individuals right to Freedom of Speech under certain circumstances.
"The first step in identifying the argument presented is defining corporation. The term may be regarded as a company or a group of people. The entity formed is authorized to act as one. This authorization is outlined by law. Each member or the company must also follow a specific purpose. They are recognized as one in law as well. The entity is legally a person. (Winter)"

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Baker, C. Edwin. "Scope of the First Amendment freedom of speech." Ucla L. Rev. 25 (1977): 964.
  • Chafee, Zechariah. Freedom of speech. Harcourt, Brace and Howe, 1920.
  • Frazier, James. Gun writer fired for piece questioning Second Amendment's reach. The Washington Times, 2013. Print. <http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/7/longtime-gun-writer-guns-ammo-fired-piece-question/>.
  • Lee, Timothy. Verizon: net neutrality violates our free speech rights. Arstechnica, 2012. Print. <http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/07/verizon-net-neutrality-violates-our-free-speech-rights/>.
  • Soley, Lawrence. "Censorship Inc.: the corporate threat to free speech in the United States." (2002).

Cite this Term Paper:

APA Format

Corporations Versus Freedom of Speech (2013, November 18) Retrieved December 09, 2023, from https://www.academon.com/term-paper/corporations-versus-freedom-of-speech-153723/

MLA Format

"Corporations Versus Freedom of Speech" 18 November 2013. Web. 09 December. 2023. <https://www.academon.com/term-paper/corporations-versus-freedom-of-speech-153723/>

Comments