Ethical Conflicts in Standardized Tests
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper discusses how, although standardized testing is increasingly used as a device to make important decisions in many different areas, including clinical, educational and industrial settings, the dangers of the tests are often underestimated. The paper relates that the underestimation of the dangers of standardised testing interferes with test takers' human right as the test scores lead to important consequences on individual test takers. The paper then argues that educating all people who are dealing with standardized testing about practical issues of psychological assessment and the ethical principles may play a key role in resolving the contradiction between privacy and reliable assessment of human psychological characteristics.
From the Paper:"A number of standardised psychological tests are now developed in many different countries as a part of the scientific basis of psychological assessments. However, there still seem to be many unsolved ethical conflicts between test takers' rights including privacy and reliability of the assessments. Historically, the testing movement has taken its pride in the scientific character that is reliability of the measurements, no matter which administrators gives the tests. Although standardised tests are constructed scientifically, they are reliable and valid under specified circumstances (Fischer, 1994). This suggests that standardized tests should be interpreted by the results obtained in the same test circumstances and the instructions. It also requires an accurate judgment about whether test norms are appropriate to new test takers. "
Sample of Sources Used:
- Alliger, G. M., & Dwight, S. A. (2001). Invade or evade? The trade-off between privacy invasion and item fakability. Applied H. R. M. Research, 6, 95-104.
- Cook, T. H. (1998). Guideline for the evaluation of dementia and age-related cognitive decline [Electronic version]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Durant, L. E., Carey, M. P. & Schroder, K. E. E. (2002). Effects of anonymity, gender, and erotophilia on the quality of data obtained from self-reports of socially sensitive behaviours. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 25, 439-467.
- Esbensen, A. J., Rojahn, J., & Michel, G. (2003). Reliability and validity of an assessment for anxiety, depression, and mood among individuals with mental retardation. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 33, 617-629.
- Fischer, C. T. (1994). Individualizing psychological assessments. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cite this Research Paper:
Ethical Conflicts in Standardized Tests (2009, August 13) Retrieved October 23, 2019, from https://www.academon.com/research-paper/ethical-conflicts-in-standardized-tests-115832/
"Ethical Conflicts in Standardized Tests" 13 August 2009. Web. 23 October. 2019. <https://www.academon.com/research-paper/ethical-conflicts-in-standardized-tests-115832/>