English-Only Policies in the American Workplace
Presents guidelines and suggestions for alternatives to the English-only policy in workplaces throughout the United States.
# 53271 | 4,850 words | 36 sources | APA | 2002 |
Published on Oct 17, 2004 in Language (English: Linguistics) , Communication (General) , Business (General) , Linguistics (General)
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The debate over whether or not English-only policies are justified in the American workplace is sure to continue; however, there is no clear-cut guidelines to determine whether or not a company should have an English-only policy. The best advice to date is to limit the implementation of an English-only policy unless there is a clear business necessity that presents justification for having one. This paper presents an overview of the English-only debate in the United States, including background information and arguments made by proponents and opponents. The paper closes with a set of guidelines for organizations deciding to either maintain or implement English-only policies and recommended alternatives to English-only policies in the American workplace.
From the Paper:"English-only is an extremely broad term. For the purposes of this paper English-only policies are the entire spectrum of language policies enforced in the workplace that either promote the usage of English or restrict the usage of non-English languages in some way. In the broader English-only debate there are other terms used to differentiate the specific type of policies enforced. In governmental legislation, an English-only law would be a law allowing "only" English usage and no usage of other languages. On the contrary, an Official English policy or law would make English the official language of use, but not restrict the usage of languages other than English. The fact that many individuals involved in English-only debates are using the same terminology to refer to different types of policies adds to the confusion. It also helps explain why, in the court rulings, it is almost impossible to provide a clear definition of why certain policies are legal and others are illegal (Hoffman, 2001, p. 3). In the United States, neither the constitution nor the federal law codifies English as the nation's official language (Santoro, 1999, p. 890). So contrary to belief of many, English is not the official language of the United States. However, twenty-three states have active Official English statutes and others are pending (Crawford, 2002). But even these statutes vary enormously. Some state statutes simply declare English as the official language of the state in sort of a symbolic gesture; much the same way state birds are named (American Civil Liberties Union, 2002). Other states, such as Arizona, which has the, "the most restrictively worded official-English law" (Arington, 1991), take their statutes much more seriously. Some state and local language laws have gone as far as to restrict the governments from providing emergency services such as police lines in non-English languages (American Civil Liberties Union, 2002)."
Cite this Research Paper:
English-Only Policies in the American Workplace (2004, October 17) Retrieved July 02, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/research-paper/english-only-policies-in-the-american-workplace-53271/
"English-Only Policies in the American Workplace" 17 October 2004. Web. 02 July. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/research-paper/english-only-policies-in-the-american-workplace-53271/>