Cases Reflecting Disparate Impact Research Paper by hicaliber

Cases Reflecting Disparate Impact
This paper describes disparate impact, which occurs when an employer uses employment practices that have a negative impact on a protected class.
# 94623 | 1,063 words | 2 sources | MLA | 2007 | US
Published on May 03, 2007 in Law (Civil) , African-American Studies (Racism) , Business (Human Resources)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

This paper presents several cases that demonstrate disparate impact and treatment in the workplace. The paper defines disparate impact and treatment as when an employer uses employment practices that have a negative impact on a protected class. Such practices can include tests, academic requirements, and physical necessities. The specific cases are highlighted for their importance to this issue and their verdicts are clearly presented.

Outline:
Disparate Impact
Disparate Treatment
Case Overview: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health
The Final Rule: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health
Implications in Today's Business Environment: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Griggs ET AL. V. Duke Power Co, 401 U.S. 427 (1971)
  • Patricia Hill V. Forum Health, Sonya Clawson - Gregg and Elizabeth Maiorana, 167 F. Appx. 448 (2006)

Cite this Research Paper:

APA Format

Cases Reflecting Disparate Impact (2007, May 03) Retrieved September 22, 2019, from https://www.academon.com/research-paper/cases-reflecting-disparate-impact-94623/

MLA Format

"Cases Reflecting Disparate Impact" 03 May 2007. Web. 22 September. 2019. <https://www.academon.com/research-paper/cases-reflecting-disparate-impact-94623/>

Comments