Cases Reflecting Disparate Impact Research Paper by hicaliber
Cases Reflecting Disparate Impact
This paper describes disparate impact, which occurs when an employer uses employment practices that have a negative impact on a protected class.
# 94623
| 1,063 words
| 2 sources
| MLA
| 2007
| 
Published
on May 03, 2007
in
Law
(Civil)
, African-American Studies
(Racism)
, Business
(Human Resources)
$19.95
Buy and instantly download this paper now
Description:
This paper presents several cases that demonstrate disparate impact and treatment in the workplace. The paper defines disparate impact and treatment as when an employer uses employment practices that have a negative impact on a protected class. Such practices can include tests, academic requirements, and physical necessities. The specific cases are highlighted for their importance to this issue and their verdicts are clearly presented.
Outline:
Disparate Impact
Disparate Treatment
Case Overview: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health
The Final Rule: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health
Implications in Today's Business Environment: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health
Outline:
Disparate Impact
Disparate Treatment
Case Overview: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health
The Final Rule: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health
Implications in Today's Business Environment: Patricia Hill V. Forum Health
Sample of Sources Used:
- Griggs ET AL. V. Duke Power Co, 401 U.S. 427 (1971)
- Patricia Hill V. Forum Health, Sonya Clawson - Gregg and Elizabeth Maiorana, 167 F. Appx. 448 (2006)
Cite this Research Paper:
APA Format
Cases Reflecting Disparate Impact (2007, May 03)
Retrieved June 06, 2023, from https://www.academon.com/research-paper/cases-reflecting-disparate-impact-94623/
MLA Format
"Cases Reflecting Disparate Impact" 03 May 2007.
Web. 06 June. 2023. <https://www.academon.com/research-paper/cases-reflecting-disparate-impact-94623/>