Should We Accept Cloning? Persuasive Essay

Should We Accept Cloning?
A persuasive paper about the negative effects of cloning and the ethical and moral questions involve.
# 2312 | 2,095 words | 10 sources | 2001 | US
Published on Feb 16, 2003 in Chemistry (Biochemistry) , Biology (Biotechnology) , Hot Topics (Cloning) , Ethics (General)

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


An argumentative paper about the negative effects of human cloning. The author discusses the moral, ethical and religious issues that he believes outweigh the medical advances of cloning. Included is an overview of what cloning is and how it could effect society in the future.

From the Paper:

"Human cloning is a controversial topic, the public regards it as inappropriate, while the leaders of certain scientific communities believe it is a sound practice that could be researched and used to benefit society. Human cloning is a form of genetic engineering, which most people consider morally wrong and, "Playing God". Through cloning an individual, you create an exact physical duplicate of that person, however, memories, personality and opinions are not recreated, and so differences do exist. Many pros and cons can be found when looking at cloning in depth, but it is my opinion that overall, it is not a beneficial procedure. There are just too many ethical issues that outweigh medical advances and prolonging life spans. A race has been started between scientists, everyone wants to be the first to clone an adult human, however with hopes of personal glorification and publicity, they have lost sight of the moral and religious issues at hand. Human cloning means creating a breed of people that have no flaws or imperfections, and since perfection does not exist, the clone could be nothing but a disappointment."

Cite this Persuasive Essay:

APA Format

Should We Accept Cloning? (2003, February 16) Retrieved January 29, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Should We Accept Cloning?" 16 February 2003. Web. 29 January. 2020. <>