Raising Payroll for In-House Training Persuasive Essay by Quality Writers

Raising Payroll for In-House Training
This paper looks at a company in Canada and argues the importance of in-house training for the company's future.
# 102760 | 1,737 words | 4 sources | MLA | 2008 | US

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


In this article the writer discusses a unionized company that involves a range of blue, pink and white collar workers. The writer argues that instead of the usual .25 to 1% of payroll given for training, it is necessary to make a .75% increase. Members of the board of directors will understand this hope of the human mesources department when made aware of a few facts shaping the request. The writer notes that all the facts pertain to trends in Canadian industry and in the overall economy that have been in place for about one decade. The writer maintains that spending more on training means a win-win situation that can benefit the company for years to come. If it is possible to retain the workers needed for the future one can avoid the expense of looking for new help, later. The writer concludes that there will be new enthusiasm and curiosity as to what workers can improve or what they learn that they can do. All of these factors make it most desirable to devote some payroll funding now to in-house training.

Training in Canada
Labour Quality
In the Light of Other Investment
Last Remarks

From the Paper:

"Only a fraction of employers give support for training. As we all know, many employers then complain when they cannot find the skilled labour they need when forced to search for new staff. Often, they must compete with various companies for the same skill sets. Also, they must do this during a crisis of business or need for high productivity. They end up spending far too much on the changed labour bill because they have not planned ahead. It is wiser to look at this kind of situation as a failure of forward planning, rather than as a blow received by a business. As board members will agree, private sector organizations often succeed by avoiding what might go wrong. Spending on training in the present makes sense, if one looks ahead and imagines a business failure, not due to a lack of orders, but due to inability to fill orders quickly. As business tends to 'move' very quickly in the economy of the day, a client is more apt to just go on to the next supplier that can produce what is needed by a given time."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Betcherman, G., N. Leckie and K. McMullen. (1998). Barriers to Employer-Sponsored Training in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks. July 7.
  • Bloom, M.R. and B. Lafleur. (1999). Turning Skills into Profit - Economic Benefits of Workplace Education Programs. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada. Report No. 1247-99-RR.
  • Hadley, K. (1996). Appropriating Working Knowledge - Workplace training in the 1990s, in T. Dunk Et Al. Eds. The Training Trap - Ideology, Training and the Labour Market. Halifax: Fernwood, 237-259.
  • Taylor, M.C. (1995). What Makes a Successful Workplace Education Program? Adult Basic Education. 5: 37-52.

Cite this Persuasive Essay:

APA Format

Raising Payroll for In-House Training (2008, March 31) Retrieved March 09, 2021, from https://www.academon.com/persuasive-essay/raising-payroll-for-in-house-training-102760/

MLA Format

"Raising Payroll for In-House Training" 31 March 2008. Web. 09 March. 2021. <https://www.academon.com/persuasive-essay/raising-payroll-for-in-house-training-102760/>