Not to Mandate a Living Wage
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The paper argues that there is a difference between minimum wage and living wage, the latter being quite different depending on the geographic and economically depressed areas of the U.S. However, one major reason in this essay why the U.S. federal government should not mandate legislation for a living wage is that is does not really eliminate poverty, provides a reason for unemployment and does not help unskilled workers improve their skills.
From the Paper:"How can a government "mandate" something when that "something" is not definable. One excellent example, is the so-called "living wage." In some instances, in poverty pockets such as Appalachia, a living wage is relatively low. Compare that with the outrageous demands of a woman about to be divorced from a rich husband, who insisted she could not possibly live on less than $43,000 a week. However, it is important to separate the idea and ideals of a fair "minimum wage" from the notion of a "living wage." "That the goal of minimum wages is to raise incomes of low-wage workers so as to reduce poverty has been forcefully argued by Senator..."
Cite this Persuasive Essay:
Not to Mandate a Living Wage (2009, December 01) Retrieved June 04, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/persuasive-essay/not-to-mandate-a-living-wage-144384/
"Not to Mandate a Living Wage" 01 December 2009. Web. 04 June. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/persuasive-essay/not-to-mandate-a-living-wage-144384/>