Semiotics and "The Godfather" Film Review by Nicky

An analysis of the signs used in the language of the film "The Godfather, Part I", directed by Francis Ford Coppola.
# 146025 | 1,037 words | 4 sources | MLA | 2010 | US
Published on Dec 14, 2010 in Film (Analysis, Criticism, Etc.) , Linguistics (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

The paper explains classical semiotic theory and goes on to show how ordinary events and things are given added significance within the symbolic context of the film "The Godfather, Part I". The paper discusses three categories of signs that are used in the language of the film; iconic signs, more conventionally symbolic signs which do not resemble the signified object but within a cultural framework stand in for something, and indexical signs which are inherently connected in some way to a larger context. The paper provides examples of all these signs and demonstrates how signs can have dual meanings. The paper also explains how in addition to the spectator's own interpretive bias, interpretations of the figures of the characters will shift from frame to frame.

From the Paper:

"Semiotics means, quite 'literally,' the decidedly non-literal theory of signs and how signs assign meaning in an arbitrary fashion to certain objects. According to classical semiotic theory, everything can be a potential 'sign' or part of a language. Language is symbolic: that is, words stand in for literal objects or concepts, so do images in the language of film. Signs can also have symbolic meanings, and the meanings of letters and signs only have significance within a particular context or system. The word 'horse' only means something to an individual who speaks English and can understand what is 'not a horse,' for example. An image of a horse can represent a real horse, or for people familiar with the Ralph Lauren Polo label, a shirt. Signs can also have particular meaning within not just cultures but works of art."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Antohin, Anatoly. "Film Semiotics." Drive-through Film Theory. February 23, 2009.http://afronord.tripod.com/theory.html
  • Dyer, Richard. "Introduction to Film Studies." From Film Studies: Critical Approaches.Edited by John Hill, Pamela Church Gibson, Richard Dyer, E. Ann Kaplan, & Paul Willemen. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Film semiotics: A metalingual analysis. 2000. February 23, 2009.http://www.sebsteph.com/Professional/sebsportfolio/journals/film_semiotics.htm
  • "The Godfather." Directed by Francis Ford Coppola. 1972.

Cite this Film Review:

APA Format

Semiotics and "The Godfather" (2010, December 14) Retrieved June 07, 2023, from https://www.academon.com/film-review/semiotics-and-the-godfather-146025/

MLA Format

"Semiotics and "The Godfather"" 14 December 2010. Web. 07 June. 2023. <https://www.academon.com/film-review/semiotics-and-the-godfather-146025/>

Comments