WTO Agricultural Negotiation Essay by serendipity

WTO Agricultural Negotiation
This paper discusses the agricultural negotiations of the World Trade Organization (WTO), an independent international organization, which establishes and maintains rules governing global trade.
# 50559 | 2,440 words | 8 sources | MLA | 2004 | US
Published on Apr 18, 2004 in International Relations (General) , Agricultural Studies (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

This paper explains that the Doha Round held in 2001 was a once-in-a-generation chance to change the rules that govern international agricultural trade so that both consumers and producers in both developed and developing countries would benefit. The author points out that the WTO agriculture negotiation has been viewed by many as an imbalanced instrument because it gives special and differential treatment to developed countries by strongly protecting them, while putting pressure on developing countries to liberalize more. The paper includes the '12 steps' program that is recommended for global human rights and food security.

Table of Contents
Introduction
Literature Review
Analysis
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"The issues slated for discussion in Cancun centered on agriculture's three pillars previously mentioned. The Ministerial also had to discuss services; market access for industrial goods; the implementation of the Uruguay Round and special and differential treatment; geographical indications; investment, competition, government procurement and trade facilitation; environment; trade rules; and dispute settlement. The overall objective was defined as the narrowing down the gap between rich and poor countries."

Cite this Essay:

APA Format

WTO Agricultural Negotiation (2004, April 18) Retrieved June 03, 2023, from https://www.academon.com/essay/wto-agricultural-negotiation-50559/

MLA Format

"WTO Agricultural Negotiation" 18 April 2004. Web. 03 June. 2023. <https://www.academon.com/essay/wto-agricultural-negotiation-50559/>

Comments