Reconstruction of the United States
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper discusses the Reconstruction of the United States. It analyzes the positives and negatives of the Reconstruction period. The paper concludes that the Reconstruction, though a positive and valid idea, did not accomplish what it was intended to accomplish. However, the paper does mention the positive outcomes that did eventuate from the period.
From the Paper:"The Reconstruction of the United States is a period that has been a topic of debate for generations. There were so many complex problems after the Civil War; it isn't surprising that many still don't have a full understanding of how the solutions were made. For a century after the war, historians claimed the Reconstruction to be a total failure to all Americans, with the belief that Southerners were capable of rebuilding without government interference and that former slaves were intellectually inferior to whites and incapable of running a government. Though there were a number of accomplishments during the Reconstruction period, the conclusion that is most apparent is that the Reconstruction was a failure, not only did it not live up to the standards of the "Radical" Republicans, but it was not revolutionary and only offered temporary visions of a better society."
Sample of Sources Used:
- Larry Madaras, Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in American History. (Dubuque: McGraw Hill, 2005), 392.
- Eric Foner, The New View of Reconstruction. (Dubuque: McGraw Hill, 2005), 393.
- John Murrin, Liberty, Equality, and Power. (Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth, 2006), 627.
Cite this Essay:
Reconstruction of the United States (2007, August 14) Retrieved May 30, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/essay/reconstruction-of-the-united-states-97402/
"Reconstruction of the United States" 14 August 2007. Web. 30 May. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/essay/reconstruction-of-the-united-states-97402/>