Natural Law and Homosexuality Essay by Master Writers

Natural Law and Homosexuality
A discussion of "what is natural" as viewed by the philosophers Burton M. Leiser and James Rachels.
# 16844 | 1,360 words | 2 sources | MLA | 2002 | US

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


The paper gives the opinions of both philosophers regarding natural law and homosexuality and addresses the Christian conception of natural law. Further, the paper asserts that many of the claims for a source for natural law are descriptive and are then distorted into something prescriptive. The paper concludes that natural law is not "natural" at all but is an artificial explanation for why certain behaviors are classified as unnatural.

From the Paper:

"When we say something is unnatural, however, there is no objective measure for this term. Man-made laws emerge from the social contract, the mythical agreement by which society was created and by which those who join society agree to abide by its laws. Thus, we know what a law is, we know what breaking a law means, and we do not argue about whether we ought to obey or not because we have accepted this precept as part of the social contract. We are all part of society, so we are all subject to society's laws."

Cite this Essay:

APA Format

Natural Law and Homosexuality (2003, January 23) Retrieved July 12, 2020, from

MLA Format

"Natural Law and Homosexuality" 23 January 2003. Web. 12 July. 2020. <>