Native vs. Non-native Anthropology Essay by Master Researcher
Native vs. Non-native Anthropology
This paper contends that distinctions between native and non-native anthropology are insignificant.
# 84761
| 1,575 words
| 4 sources
| 2005
|

Published
on Dec 01, 2005
in
Anthropology
(General)
$19.95
Buy and instantly download this paper now
Description:
This paper explains that a native anthropologist is one who conducts research in their own society whereas a regular anthropologist conducts research in any society. The paper considers how some would argue that there should be a distinction. This paper presents the hypothesis that the distinctions between native and regular anthropology do not matter. To support this argument, the work of the following two anthropologists is considered; Vincent Crapanzano, who is considered a Native anthropologist because he is doing research in his own society and Anne Allison, an American doing research in Japan.
Cite this Essay:
APA Format
Native vs. Non-native Anthropology (2005, December 01)
Retrieved February 03, 2023, from https://www.academon.com/essay/native-vs-non-native-anthropology-84761/
MLA Format
"Native vs. Non-native Anthropology" 01 December 2005.
Web. 03 February. 2023. <https://www.academon.com/essay/native-vs-non-native-anthropology-84761/>