Native vs. Non-native Anthropology Essay by Master Researcher

Native vs. Non-native Anthropology
This paper contends that distinctions between native and non-native anthropology are insignificant.
# 84761 | 1,575 words | 4 sources | 2005 | US
Published on Dec 01, 2005 in Anthropology (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

This paper explains that a native anthropologist is one who conducts research in their own society whereas a regular anthropologist conducts research in any society. The paper considers how some would argue that there should be a distinction. This paper presents the hypothesis that the distinctions between native and regular anthropology do not matter. To support this argument, the work of the following two anthropologists is considered; Vincent Crapanzano, who is considered a Native anthropologist because he is doing research in his own society and Anne Allison, an American doing research in Japan.

Cite this Essay:

APA Format

Native vs. Non-native Anthropology (2005, December 01) Retrieved February 03, 2023, from https://www.academon.com/essay/native-vs-non-native-anthropology-84761/

MLA Format

"Native vs. Non-native Anthropology" 01 December 2005. Web. 03 February. 2023. <https://www.academon.com/essay/native-vs-non-native-anthropology-84761/>

Comments