Michael Newdow Vs U.S. Congress Essay by Master Researcher

Michael Newdow Vs U.S. Congress
Study of the lawsuit "Michael Newdow vs. U.S. Congress" and the judge's ruling regarding the case.
# 32018 | 900 words | 5 sources | 2002 | US
Published on Sep 18, 2003 in Law (Constitution) , Law (Historic Trials)

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


Most legal and constitutional experts advocate separation of state and church keeping in view the multicultural society of the United States. The government also understands the significance of keeping state matters away from religious jurisdiction and therefore seeks to formulate laws, which are secular in nature. However there are still some laws which contain words that are consistent with the principle of separation and thus create problems for people who do not endorse views held by the majority of the American public. In one recent lawsuit, Michael Newdow opposed the addition of the wording, 'Under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance. This paper focuses on this case and Judge Goodwin's ruling showing that the decision was solely based on legal facts and not personal sentiments.

Cite this Essay:

APA Format

Michael Newdow Vs U.S. Congress (2003, September 18) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from https://www.academon.com/essay/michael-newdow-vs-us-congress-32018/

MLA Format

"Michael Newdow Vs U.S. Congress" 18 September 2003. Web. 23 April. 2024. <https://www.academon.com/essay/michael-newdow-vs-us-congress-32018/>