Machiavelli and Hobbes
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper discusses the conditions on which an interloper can be accepted or rejected by the citizens of a newly captured country. The conditions are based on the philosophical works of Thomas Hobbes and Machiavelli. The paper shows that both Hobbes and Machiavelli believe that it is futile to reject someone off hand because such rejection would only result in waste of energy and nothing else. They feel that there are some important attributes which make a ruler strong and worthy of our respect and thus he should be rejected only if he doesn?t possess the right attributes.
From the Paper:"A ruler who is able to command respect whether through the use of force or otherwise need not be rejected because he is likely to prove more beneficial for the country than the weak leader he overthrew. In the light of our current understanding of politics, we may find this argument rather strange in nature. But the truth is that today we do not think in terms of what is good for our country and rather become irrationally sentimental when someone threatens to overthrow our government. We must remember that as long as a ruler is capable of running the country well and is respected by his people, he need not be rejected. In the case of an interloper, we must first study the situation from all possible angles before deciding on our next course of action."
Cite this Essay:
Machiavelli and Hobbes (2003, January 21) Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.academon.com/essay/machiavelli-and-hobbes-23376/
"Machiavelli and Hobbes" 21 January 2003. Web. 18 April. 2021. <https://www.academon.com/essay/machiavelli-and-hobbes-23376/>