Law Science Evidence Essay by Top Papers

Law Science Evidence
Bertin and Henifind (B&H) "The American legal system faces challenges in the realm of expert opinion and scientific evidence. In cases like Daubert, where non-accredited scientific testimony was dismissed, the question of what role science is allowed ...
# 141310 | 1,250 words | 2 sources | MLA | 2008 | US
Published on Dec 01, 2008 in Law (Evidence)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

Bertin and Henifind (B&H) "The American legal system faces challenges in the realm of expert opinion and scientific evidence. In cases like Daubert, where non-accredited scientific testimony was dismissed, the question of what role science is allowed to play in the courtroom is called into question, as is the issue of what evidence can be legally admitted as science."

From the Paper:

Bertin and Henifind (B&H) "The American legal system faces challenges in the realm of expert opinion and scientific evidence. In cases like Daubert, where non-accredited scientific testimony was dismissed, the question of what role science is allowed to play in the courtroom is called into question, as is the issue of what evidence can be legally admitted as science." Redding and Reppucci (R&R) "The problem here is not merely one of forming a solid legal procedure. Over and above the challenges you mention, there is also the judicial resistance that experts face in the courtroom. Cases such as Hodgson v. Minnesota demonstrate how social science is ignored in

Cite this Essay:

APA Format

Law Science Evidence (2008, December 01) Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://www.academon.com/essay/law-science-evidence-141310/

MLA Format

"Law Science Evidence" 01 December 2008. Web. 18 September. 2019. <https://www.academon.com/essay/law-science-evidence-141310/>

Comments