Contrasting the Natural State of War in the Governing Principles of Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke Essay by Top Papers

Contrasting the Natural State of War in the Governing Principles of Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke
In this paper, the premise of war as depicted by Rousseau's commentary on the nature of conflict after man's earlier and more primitive innocence is greatly differing than those proposed by Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes proposes that humans are naturally ...
# 137661 | 1,000 words | 3 sources | MLA | 2008 | US
Published on Dec 01, 2008 in Philosophy (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

In this paper, the premise of war as depicted by Rousseau's commentary on the nature of conflict after man's earlier and more primitive innocence is greatly differing than those proposed by Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes proposes that humans are naturally selfish and prone to war, which presupposes an innate inclination to violate and abuse social contracts. Locke also does not agree with Rousseau, as he believes that man has in an innate ability to liberty that reveals a more positive and hopeful understanding of the 'innocence' that Rousseau imparts in this quote on war.

Cite this Essay:

APA Format

Contrasting the Natural State of War in the Governing Principles of Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke (2008, December 01) Retrieved November 26, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/essay/contrasting-the-natural-state-of-war-in-the-governing-principles-of-rousseau-hobbes-and-locke-137661/

MLA Format

"Contrasting the Natural State of War in the Governing Principles of Rousseau, Hobbes, and Locke" 01 December 2008. Web. 26 November. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/essay/contrasting-the-natural-state-of-war-in-the-governing-principles-of-rousseau-hobbes-and-locke-137661/>

Comments