Structural Functionalism and Neo-Marxism
This paper compares and contrasts the primary basis for two main bodies of thought, according to modern sociological theory: structural functionalism and neo-Marxism. It then presents a critical analysis of their relevance to sociological thought.
# 25074 | 4,767 words | 4 sources | APA | 2002 |
Published on Apr 23, 2003 in Political Science (Communism) , Sociology (Theory) , Philosophy (Ethics) , Political Science (Marx / Engels)
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The paper also presents and discusses major variations within these approaches. Structural functionalism sees the social system as being made up of mutually dependent part. Neo-Marxist theory states that there are systemic biases that stem from conflict between two fixed classes that are endemic to capitalism.
From the Paper:"In analyzing Neomarxist theories, it is most effective to see the many varieties as a continuum, beginning with Marx and his original concept, then tracing the way sociological theorists have built on these and each others theories. Marx developed a theory that contained a far-reaching worldview. Because his perspective was so broad, 1 Ritzer, p. 207 there is considerable opportunity for conflict and irreconcilable differences among the theorists who each claim to be the true inheritor of the Marxian tradition.3 "
Cite this Comparison Essay:
Structural Functionalism and Neo-Marxism (2003, April 23) Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/structural-functionalism-and-neo-marxism-25074/
"Structural Functionalism and Neo-Marxism" 23 April 2003. Web. 18 April. 2021. <https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/structural-functionalism-and-neo-marxism-25074/>