Structural Functionalism and Neo-Marxism Comparison Essay by chief

Structural Functionalism and Neo-Marxism
This paper compares and contrasts the primary basis for two main bodies of thought, according to modern sociological theory: structural functionalism and neo-Marxism. It then presents a critical analysis of their relevance to sociological thought.
# 25074 | 4,767 words | 4 sources | APA | 2002 | US


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

The paper also presents and discusses major variations within these approaches. Structural functionalism sees the social system as being made up of mutually dependent part. Neo-Marxist theory states that there are systemic biases that stem from conflict between two fixed classes that are endemic to capitalism.

From the Paper:

"In analyzing Neomarxist theories, it is most effective to see the many varieties as a continuum, beginning with Marx and his original concept, then tracing the way sociological theorists have built on these and each others theories. Marx developed a theory that contained a far-reaching worldview. Because his perspective was so broad, 1 Ritzer, p. 207 there is considerable opportunity for conflict and irreconcilable differences among the theorists who each claim to be the true inheritor of the Marxian tradition.3 "

Cite this Comparison Essay:

APA Format

Structural Functionalism and Neo-Marxism (2003, April 23) Retrieved April 18, 2021, from https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/structural-functionalism-and-neo-marxism-25074/

MLA Format

"Structural Functionalism and Neo-Marxism" 23 April 2003. Web. 18 April. 2021. <https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/structural-functionalism-and-neo-marxism-25074/>

Comments