Natural Law According to Thomas Hobbes and St.Thomas Aquinas
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The following paper examines why many theorists reject the existence of natural law as well as why many agree to its being defined as a set of innate moral principles which are common to all human beings. It is the aim of this paper to identify and discuss the important similarities and differences that exist between the two theories making reference to the theories of Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679) and St.Thomas Aquinas (1224/25 - 1274).
From the Paper:“Aquinas proposed that the essential quality setting human beings apart from the rest of the animal world was that of reason. In a development of Aristotle’s theory.Aquinas asserts that all men naturally possess an internalized divine spark of reason,which serves as the guide to an autonomous and responsible decision making process.”
Cite this Comparison Essay:
Natural Law According to Thomas Hobbes and St.Thomas Aquinas (2003, February 11) Retrieved August 13, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/natural-law-according-to-thomas-hobbes-and-st-thomas-aquinas-4804/
"Natural Law According to Thomas Hobbes and St.Thomas Aquinas" 11 February 2003. Web. 13 August. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/natural-law-according-to-thomas-hobbes-and-st-thomas-aquinas-4804/>