Moses Maimonides and Friedrich Schleiermacher Comparison Essay by anvilman

Moses Maimonides and Friedrich Schleiermacher
A close reading of the differences between the theories of Moses Maimonides and Friedrich Schleiermacher.
# 91503 | 2,374 words | 2 sources | APA | 2006 | CA
Published on Jan 24, 2007 in Literature (World) , English (Analysis) , Philosophy (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

This paper discusses the differences between the theories of reading espoused by Moses Maimonides and Friedrich Schleiermacher. The paper presents the complex and persuasive arguments of Maimonides for Cabalism and of Schleiermacher for Hermeneutics. The paper focuses on the author's arguments for the validity of their own systems.

From the Paper:

"Hermeneutics and Cabalism represent two radically different philosophies of textual analysis and understanding that have developed in the West. Hermeneutics views a text as an object to be analyzed, fully comprehended, and mastered; Cabalism views a text as a living subject, constantly morphing and ultimately indomitable. Hermeneutics and Cabalism are expounded by Freidrich Schleiermacher and Moses Maimonides, respectably."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Maimonides, Moses. "Guide of the Perplexed." The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.
  • Schleiermacher, Friedrich. "Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings." The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001.

Cite this Comparison Essay:

APA Format

Moses Maimonides and Friedrich Schleiermacher (2007, January 24) Retrieved May 10, 2021, from https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/moses-maimonides-and-friedrich-schleiermacher-91503/

MLA Format

"Moses Maimonides and Friedrich Schleiermacher" 24 January 2007. Web. 10 May. 2021. <https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/moses-maimonides-and-friedrich-schleiermacher-91503/>

Comments