Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper examines how both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X used their writings and speeches to counteract and negate white racism. The author points out that the main difference between the ideologies of two Civil Rights activist is the polarity of violent and non violent. The paper relates that King did not see violence as a sensible means to change average white Americans to supporting black equality in government and social status.
From the Paper:"This race study examines the contrary opinions about fighting racism that existed between Martin Luther King Jr. and another race activist in the Civil Rights era, Malcolm X. The use of violence to win the freedom of black people in America is presented in Malcolm X's speech "Message to the Grass Roots". Contrary to this message of violence toward white authority, Martin Luther King sought non-violent methods of activism to help change white America's negative opinions on the black race. In this manner, both King and Malcolm X offer two polarized opinions about violence and non-violence that existed within the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. The message of violent action against white racist society is clearly portended in the speech "Message to the Grassroots". "
Cite this Comparison Essay:
Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X (2005, December 01) Retrieved September 19, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/martin-luther-king-jr-and-malcolm-x-83521/
" Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X" 01 December 2005. Web. 19 September. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/martin-luther-king-jr-and-malcolm-x-83521/>