Herod the Great and Constantine
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper compares Herod the Great, who ruled the Roman province of Judea in the last decades of the pre-Christian era, with the fourth century Roman emperor Constantine, as builders and shapers of Jerusalem. The paper discusses how both kings are accused of abusing religion in order to further their political goals, and both men were responsible for ambitious building projects in Jerusalem. The paper points out that Herod's use of religion was far more cynical and self-promoting than that of Constantine.
From the Paper:"Herod the Great, who ruled the Roman province of Judea in the last decades of the pre-Christian era, and the fourth century Roman emperor Constantine, were both opportunistic rulers who understood the intricate connections between politics and religion in the ancient world. Each of them used religion as a tool to engage the loyalty of the people, and each of them realized that ambitious building projects were also useful in winning over their subjects.
"Despite their common approaches to ruling and their shared understanding of the importance of religion to the respective success of their reigns, Herod and Constantine found themselves in circumstances quite different, for Constantine was the acknowledged and legitimate ruler of the vast Roman Empire, while Herod was a minor king of a small land who was little more than a puppet of Rome. Because their historical, geographical, and political situations were so different, Herod and Constantine differed in their uses of religion in important ways, as we shall see as their careers are examined in brief but illuminating detail."
Cite this Comparison Essay:
Herod the Great and Constantine (2003, November 02) Retrieved August 11, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/herod-the-great-and-constantine-33519/
"Herod the Great and Constantine" 02 November 2003. Web. 11 August. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/herod-the-great-and-constantine-33519/>