Descartes' Nativism vs. Locke's Empiricism Comparison Essay by Master Researcher

Descartes' Nativism vs. Locke's Empiricism
Defines and contrasts the philosophical doctrines of Descartes' Nativism and Locke's Empiricism.
# 32032 | 650 words | 3 sources | 2002 | US
Published on Sep 21, 2003 in Philosophy (General)

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


Nativist thought, that which focuses on the idea that there are some "innate ideas existing prior to concrete experience (Fancher, 26), allows for the existence of archetypal knowledge and a communal unconscious. Empiricism is a philosophical doctrine that asserts that all knowledge is derived from experience. According to the empiricist, all ideas are derived from experience. Nativism, as espoused by Descartes, requires that the soul be embodied with knowledge and experience prior to association with the body.

Cite this Comparison Essay:

APA Format

Descartes' Nativism vs. Locke's Empiricism (2003, September 21) Retrieved March 23, 2023, from

MLA Format

"Descartes' Nativism vs. Locke's Empiricism" 21 September 2003. Web. 23 March. 2023. <>