Content Restrictions On Canadian Television
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
Examines and contrasts two different perspectives. David Miller's argument that national cutlure must be protected, even at the expense of individual liberities. John Stuart Mills' philosophy that the principle of freedom and individuality should prevail. Issue involved is regulation that Canadian broadcasters must restrict amount of foreign programs.
From the Paper:"In their respective works, John Stuart Mills and David Miller offer contrasting perspectives on this issue of content restrictions on Canadian television. Mills? work, On Liberty, celebrates the principle of freedom and individuality. On the other hand, Miller's work, On Nationality, highlights the importance of protecting national culture, even at the expense of individual liberties. Thus, Mills would regard the requirement that Canadian broadcasters restrict their amount of foreign programs to 65 percent as a gross invasion of individual freedom. In contrast, Miller would agree that this regulation is necessary to prevent further erosion of the Canadian culture through American programming.
The basic premise of Mills? position is that individuals should have the freedom to think and act as they wish, as long as ..."
Cite this Comparison Essay:
Content Restrictions On Canadian Television (2003, April 09) Retrieved October 02, 2022, from https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/content-restrictions-on-canadian-television-24819/
"Content Restrictions On Canadian Television" 09 April 2003. Web. 02 October. 2022. <https://www.academon.com/comparison-essay/content-restrictions-on-canadian-television-24819/>