Pennell v. State of Delaware
This paper examines the case of Pennell v. State of Delaware in which the court addressed issues surrounding an expert's testimony about serial killers.
# 95771 | 1,695 words | 4 sources | APA | 2007 |
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper explains that the distinctive elements, which help an expert develop a profile on a criminal and are referred to as a criminal signature, are elements of a crime that appear somewhat unique and allow the crime to stand out from similar crimes. The author points out that, in the Pennel v. State of Delaware case, the court made the correct decision to allow the expert to testify regarding the signature elements of the murders because these elements were crucial in linking the defendant to two of the murders. The paper relates that the fact that the defendant was found not guilty of one of the murders demonstrates that juries use signature elements as tools for decision making but do substitute the presence of certain criminal signatures for a lack of reasonable doubt.
Sample of Sources Used:
- Del. R. Evid. 404(b).
- Del. R. Evid. 702.
- Douglas, J.E. & Munn, C. (1992). Violent crime scene analysis: modus operandi, signature, And staging. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. Web site: http://www.fbi.gov/library/leb/leb.htm
- Pennell v. State, 602 A.2d 48 (Del., 1991).
Cite this Case Study:
Pennell v. State of Delaware (2007, May 31) Retrieved December 05, 2023, from https://www.academon.com/case-study/pennell-v-state-of-delaware-95771/
"Pennell v. State of Delaware" 31 May 2007. Web. 05 December. 2023. <https://www.academon.com/case-study/pennell-v-state-of-delaware-95771/>