Rhetorical Analysis of 'Media, Communication, Culture' Book Review by writingwiz

Rhetorical Analysis of 'Media, Communication, Culture'
This paper looks at the work 'Media, Communication, Culture' by James Lull and discusses modern communication's impact on society.
# 100783 | 2,089 words | 1 source | MLA | 2007 | US


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

In this article, the writer discusses that in today's world, the mass media has an impact in almost all we do as people. The writer notes that media affects everything from what clothes we wear to what television programs we watch. The writer discusses that James Lull, in his book 'Media, Communication, Culture' explains how media interacts and affects the communication among people and how culture changes with advances in media and technology. The writer concludes that 'Media, Communication, and Culture' informs an audience of how the mass media and modern forms of communication have affected the development of culture and the ways of society. Further, the writer maintains that James Lull uses a distinctive style and a logical structure in order to properly educate his audience about the influence mass media has on today's world.

From the Paper:

"Within each chapter, he inserts an article on a real life example of events where mass media, human communication, and culture were involved and had an effect. Such events as the Chinese student rebellion at Tiananmen Square in 1989 and the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal in the mid-1990's are included along with explanations of how media, communication, and culture had an effect on these historical events. Along with modern events, Lull includes historical changes in media and communication to emphasize his argument that mass media and technological advances have had major effects on societies across the world. His structure also allows for any member of his audience to follow and understand what he puts forth. Lull avoids implication and instead tells the audience what he wants them to know to avoid letting them infer it on their own. An informed audience will also understand an author's purpose more readily than an audience which inferred the author's intentions. Lull also tends to end discussions by putting more emphasis on his own ideas and support of others that follows what he believes about media, communication, and culture."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Lull, James. Media, Communication, Culture. New York: Columbia UP, 2000.

Cite this Book Review:

APA Format

Rhetorical Analysis of 'Media, Communication, Culture' (2008, February 01) Retrieved October 22, 2019, from https://www.academon.com/book-review/rhetorical-analysis-of-media-communication-culture-100783/

MLA Format

"Rhetorical Analysis of 'Media, Communication, Culture'" 01 February 2008. Web. 22 October. 2019. <https://www.academon.com/book-review/rhetorical-analysis-of-media-communication-culture-100783/>

Comments