The Death Penalty as a Deterrence and Retribution Argumentative Essay by scribbler

The Death Penalty as a Deterrence and Retribution
An argument that the death penalty is used as deterrence and as an ultimate form of retribution.
# 153033 | 1,244 words | 5 sources | APA | 2013 | US
Published on May 02, 2013 in Hot Topics (Capital Punishment)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

The paper discusses the argument that the death penalty should be used as a deterrent in order to not only make sure that the particular murderer does not kill again but to also deter those who have not yet killed. The second argument the paper presents is that it is a definitive form of retribution, and if crimes are left unpunished or under punished, then criminals are not affected and crimes continue to be committed.

Outline:
Introduction
Deterrence
Retribution
Conclusion

From the Paper:

"Society has for all time utilized penalty to put off would be criminals from illegal deeds. Because civilization has the uppermost interest in stopping murder, it should utilize the strongest penalty accessible to discourage murder, and that is the death penalty. If offenders are sentenced to death and put to death, probable murders will often reconsider killing for fear of losing their own life. The death penalty definitely discourages the murderer who is put to death. Strictly speaking, this is a type of incapacitation; comparable to the way a person who robs is put in jail is prohibited from robbing while locked up (Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty, 2000).
"The incapacitation consequence saves lives. By putting offenders to death one prevents them from killing again and thus, saving innocent lives. The proof of this is decisive and unquestionable. Additionally, the individual prevention effect also shows that executions save innocent lives. This consequence symbolizes those likely offenders who did not kill under precise conditions for the reason of their dread of being put to death. There are numerous renowned cases, showing numerous innocent lives saved by the fear of being put to death. Situations state that the preponderance of these cases will never be recognized and that the amount of guiltless lives saved by individual prevention has been, greater than will ever be known."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • A Prosecutor Speaks. (2003). Retrieved November 20, 2010, from Web site: http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/prosecutor.htm
  • Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty. (2000). Retrieved November 20, 2010, from Web site: http://deathpenaltycurriculum.org/student/c/about/arguments/arguments.PDF
  • Death Penalty Arguments: Deterrent or Revenge (Pros and Cons). (1997). Retrieved November 20, 2010, from Web site: http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/ornellaspaper.htm
  • Sharp, Dudley. (1997). Death Penalty and Sentencing Information. Retrieved November 20, 2010, from Web site: http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/dp.html
  • Should the death penalty be used for retribution? (2009). Retrieved November 21, 2010, from Web site: http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001004

Cite this Argumentative Essay:

APA Format

The Death Penalty as a Deterrence and Retribution (2013, May 02) Retrieved March 20, 2023, from https://www.academon.com/argumentative-essay/the-death-penalty-as-a-deterrence-and-retribution-153033/

MLA Format

"The Death Penalty as a Deterrence and Retribution" 02 May 2013. Web. 20 March. 2023. <https://www.academon.com/argumentative-essay/the-death-penalty-as-a-deterrence-and-retribution-153033/>

Comments