This paper argues that, although quasi-public privatized spaces, like Universal City Walk in Los Angeles, show ethnic diversity and do not result in social stratification, they do represent the destruction of democratic public space.
# 27732 | 1,590 words | 6 sources | MLA | 2002 |
Published on Jun 17, 2003 in Architecture (Theory) , Criminology (Public and Crime) , Sociology (General)
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper explains that, although spaces like City Walk do not outright cause social stratification, they do result in segregation and unreal expectations of what public space truly represents. The paper states that a variety of security mechanisms has been put in place to prevent potential criminal activity. The author believes that, although spaces like City Walk may resemble true democratic public spaces, they actually are designed to attract consumers, thereby, automatically filtering out objectionable or disagreeable visitors.
From the Paper:"City Walk was developed and constructed as a safe haven for consumers. The clientele that City Walk attracts is a young, affluent and classy sort with money to spend. Consumers do not feel threatened due to the prevalence of security patrols and surveillance cameras that are posted throughout the park. City Walk, however, excludes an important part of the true urban population, people such as the homeless and perhaps even gang members who would normally be visible in a democratic public space."
Cite this Argumentative Essay:
City Walk (2003, June 17) Retrieved October 07, 2022, from https://www.academon.com/argumentative-essay/city-walk-27732/
"City Walk" 17 June 2003. Web. 07 October. 2022. <https://www.academon.com/argumentative-essay/city-walk-27732/>