Vancouver & The Olympics Project
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
In this article, the writer discusses that though the bodies in charge of development in Vancouver ahead of the 2010 Olympic Games talk of a project characterized by a commitment to sustainability, this commitment seems piecemeal and ineffective. The government and VANOC seem to be motivated by what drives most planners - money. The SEFC development and related Olympics projects seem set to inject money into Vancouver's economy, but current planning strategies appear to interfere with environmental and especially social initiatives. The writer maintains that as low-income earners (notably, Vancouver's homeless) are swept aside in order to beautify the city, the natural environment of SEFC also makes way for urban development. The writer discusses whether this urban development, despite claims of the opposite, will result in gentrification.
From the Paper:"Vancouver has committed to hosting the world's first sustainable Olympic Games in 2010. The goal of the city is in keeping with local policy trends in the Vancouver region toward visions of sustainability. As the issue of sustainability increasingly becomes linked with development across the globe, the problems implicit in the approach become more and more evident. Is "smart growth" (Downs 2001), another term for sustainable development, really achievable in Vancouver? Does current Olympic and Southeast False Creek development really follow social, environmental and economic ..."
Cite this Analytical Essay:
Vancouver & The Olympics Project (2007, December 01) Retrieved January 28, 2022, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/vancouver-the-olympics-project-136474/
"Vancouver & The Olympics Project" 01 December 2007. Web. 28 January. 2022. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/vancouver-the-olympics-project-136474/>