U.S. Involvement in Bosnia Analytical Essay by Master Researcher

U.S. Involvement in Bosnia
An analysis of the foreign policy of the United States regarding conflict in Bosnia.
# 36269 | 1,150 words | 5 sources | MLA | 2002 | US


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

This paper provides an analysis of US foreign policy objectives and security stance in the Bosnia situation and the effects it has had on the world order. The paper assesses the way in which the American government interpreted the origins of the conflict, and argues that the great defect of American policy toward Bosnia has stemmed from the disjunction between ends that were overly ambitious and means that were plainly inadequate to the stated objectives. The paper contends that the American government badly needs to break the mold it has set for itself and pledge its power to a definitive settlement.

From the Paper:

"Some of the most insistent criticism of both the Bush and Clinton administrations for failing to give military support to the Bosnian Muslims has come from those whose anti-interventionist disposition had long been taken for granted. Although the war in Bosnia has aroused such strong emotions and passions, it has not evoked comparable appeals for the sacrifice of blood and treasure. With very few exceptions, those who have called for American intervention have been careful to emphasize the quite modest costs they are willing to pay in intervening. While insistent that the interests at stake in Bosnia are very great, they are equally insistent that these interests be secured at modest cost. The debate over Bosnia has thus been marked by a disjunction between interests avowed and costs rejected. It has also been marked by a view of the war's origins that must yield a distorted picture of the interests that are at stake. The conflict is not, as it has been so often depicted, a conventional case of aggression by one state (Serbia) against another (Bosnia). The insistence upon seeing its origins in these terms must distort its true nature, obscure the objectives of an intervention, and lead to a view of the interests at stake in the war that is misleading and unpersuasive. It is not the repelling of aggression as neither such, nor the maintenance of that ill-defined abstraction known as "world order," that constitute the interests at stake in Bosnia."

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

U.S. Involvement in Bosnia (2003, October 02) Retrieved July 08, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/us-involvement-in-bosnia-36269/

MLA Format

"U.S. Involvement in Bosnia" 02 October 2003. Web. 08 July. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/us-involvement-in-bosnia-36269/>

Comments