The Philosophical Rhetoric of Right and Wrong Analytical Essay by Top Papers

The Philosophical Rhetoric of Right and Wrong
This paper analyzes cultural bias versus objectivity for journalism within the modern media.
# 131208 | 3,000 words | 0 sources | MLA | 2006 | US

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


In this paper, the philosophical principles of Aristotle and Plato are analyzed in relation to the growing conflict of bias and objectivity in modern journalism. The writer discusses that the growing capitalistic tendencies of the 20th and 21st century American news service is the direct result of massive privatized corporations holding a monopoly over objective reporting and news presentation. The writer notes that often, the examples of the War in Iraq provide key points in the way that news coverage provides a moral based virtue that strays the from the academic intellectual virtue that Aristotle discusses in his Nicomachean ethics.

From the Paper:

"The aim of this philosophical study will bring forth the views of Aristotle and Plato to analyze the current issues of bias and objectivity that exist within the cultural construct of journalism and the modern media. By evaluating the issues of rhetoric as put forth by Plato and Aristotle, one can realize the often-tainted perspective for truth within the institutional nationalism and capitalism of modern media corporations. In this manner, the issue of ethics arises within an Aristotelian format that defines how journalism can be perceived trough intellectual virtues ..."

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

The Philosophical Rhetoric of Right and Wrong (2006, December 01) Retrieved December 03, 2021, from

MLA Format

"The Philosophical Rhetoric of Right and Wrong" 01 December 2006. Web. 03 December. 2021. <>