the Ethical Debate of Stem Cell Research
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The paper explains how scientists are divided over the priorities and ethics of stem-cell research. The paper discusses how some maintain that the promise of stem-cell research is so great, the federal government should fund what so far has been a strictly private-sector research effort, while others argue that federal research should be done only on stem cells from adults, so as not to encourage additional abortions, or the manufacture and destruction of human embryos. The paper highlights the key question in this debate that is "When does biological material achieve the moral status of a person?".
From the Paper:"An embryo's stem cells are generally considered by scientists to be more versatile-after all, every human being springs from the ultimate, original stem cell, that is, a fertilized egg. The stem cells that multiply quickly in the development of an embryo, being more complex yet less specialized, can theoretically be converted into almost any kind of cell. But an adult's more-specialized stem cells can be converted into only a narrower range of other kinds of working cells, say scientists. That narrowness is frustrating for pure research scientists. But for physicians, adult stem cells may hold more promise because they'll most likely be used for very specific functions, such as patching damaged kidneys, livers, brains, and other organs. Moreover, an adult's stem cells can be found within each patient, thus reducing the risk of tissue rejection or uncontrolled growth. (Weiss 2000)"
Cite this Analytical Essay:
the Ethical Debate of Stem Cell Research (2003, September 25) Retrieved January 27, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/the-ethical-debate-of-stem-cell-research-36242/
"the Ethical Debate of Stem Cell Research" 25 September 2003. Web. 27 January. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/the-ethical-debate-of-stem-cell-research-36242/>