The Due Process Model vs. The Crime Control Model
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The criminal justice system here in the United States has traditionally operated under the premises of two fundamentally opposing goals. One goal is the crime control goal. This goal operates under the idea that criminals should be aggressively pursued and crimes aggressively punished. The other goal is the due process goal. This goal operates under the premise that the rights of the accused need to be carefully protected in any criminal justice investigation. This paper examines both of these positions, determining which one is the better goal for the United States to pursue, and why.
From the Paper:"Liberals have been the traditional defenders of the due process model (Perron). They are certainly operating under noble guidelines. The United States Constitution itself carefully lays out the rights of the accused in a series of amendments in the Bill of Rights. The Founding Fathers were obviously very concerned about protecting the rights of the accused, or these protections would not have been included in the Constitution. Should we as a nation follow any less stringent standards in dealing with our accused today? "
Cite this Analytical Essay:
The Due Process Model vs. The Crime Control Model (2004, January 21) Retrieved January 24, 2021, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/the-due-process-model-vs-the-crime-control-model-46771/
"The Due Process Model vs. The Crime Control Model" 21 January 2004. Web. 24 January. 2021. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/the-due-process-model-vs-the-crime-control-model-46771/>