Pontiac v. Spellings Analytical Essay by ResearchRiter

Pontiac v. Spellings
An argument on behalf of the School District of the City of Pontiac Michigan.
# 123819 | 2,000 words | 19 sources | APA | 2008 | US
Published on Dec 01, 2008 in Education (Theory) , Sociology (Theory) , Political Science (U.S. Federal Politics) , Law (General)

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


In this article, the writer argues in favor of the plaintiffs/appellants in Pontiac v. Spellings in their appeal of federal government unfunded mandates associated with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

From the Paper:

"The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law as described by the National Education Association (NEA) essentially states that the federal government must pay for the rules and regulations that it is now imposing on the nation's public schools. Multiple mandates under the NCLB are designed to foster dramatic improvements in student achievement and learning outcomes while addressing ongoing concerns regarding very real disparities and inequities in the national public school system."

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

Pontiac v. Spellings (2008, December 01) Retrieved June 25, 2019, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/pontiac-v-spellings-123819/

MLA Format

"Pontiac v. Spellings" 01 December 2008. Web. 25 June. 2019. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/pontiac-v-spellings-123819/>