Plato vs. Aristotle on Proper Government
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
This paper looks at Plato and Aristotle in their different assessments of what leadership should be, as a set of forces that should bring out the best in citizens towards cohesive and stable city-states. The paper discusses how for Plato, the polis had to have an elite prepared to truly lead, since an example set at the top is more apt to be followed elsewhere. The paper then discusses how Aristotle noted the mistrust of oligarchy and the need to equip all to be better citizens who felt they were not simply directed.
From the Paper:"Plato and Aristotle stressed the importance of the good government of a polis that would permit its citizens to become fully virtuous human beings. However, their ideas differed strongly in terms of the role of politics in bringing about good government as a framework that could enable the common good. This paper explores significant differences that continue to surface in our contemporary study of both political science and political philosophy. It can seem when reflecting on the works discussed here, as though Humanity really has two choices when seeing..."
Cite this Analytical Essay:
Plato vs. Aristotle on Proper Government (2007, December 01) Retrieved October 03, 2022, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/plato-vs-aristotle-on-proper-government-135622/
"Plato vs. Aristotle on Proper Government" 01 December 2007. Web. 03 October. 2022. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/plato-vs-aristotle-on-proper-government-135622/>