Philosophy of Religion Analytical Essay by Top Papers

Philosophy of Religion
This paper discusses the epistemic respectability of religious belief.
# 130632 | 1,500 words | 0 sources | MLA | 2006 | US
Published on Dec 01, 2006 in Philosophy (Religion) , Philosophy (Epistemology) , Religion and Theology (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

In this article, the writer maintains that the prospect of defending the epistemic respectability of religious belief (in a general sense) is not as logical as attacking the cognitive adequacy of such a perspective. The writer discusses that classical theism, generally used as a term to capture the general spiritual essence of God, suffers even in its basic roots owing to a lack of universally-accepted definition of what "God" is. Concepts seen as pertaining to classical theism - the existence of God, spirituality, life after death, miracles, and religious phenomena - generally cannot be proven, and often contain inherent contradictions in their explanation.

From the Paper:

"What are the prospects for defending the epistemic respectability of religious belief, where this is understood in a wide sense, not necessarily confined to institutionalized religion? Introduction The prospect of defending the epistemic respectability of religious belief (in a general sense) is not as logical as attacking the cognitive adequacy of such a perspective. Classical theism, generally used as a term to capture the general spiritual essence of God, suffers even in its basic roots owing to a lack of universally-accepted definition of what "God" is. Concepts seen as pertaining to classical theism - the existence of God ..."

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

Philosophy of Religion (2006, December 01) Retrieved April 21, 2021, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/philosophy-of-religion-130632/

MLA Format

"Philosophy of Religion" 01 December 2006. Web. 21 April. 2021. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/philosophy-of-religion-130632/>

Comments