Nursing Articles Reviewed Analytical Essay by writingsensation

Nursing Articles Reviewed
A critical review of two research articles (one experimental and one non-experimental) regarding nursing.
# 68221 | 973 words | 2 sources | APA | 2005 | US
Published on Aug 09, 2006 in Medical and Health (Nursing) , English (Analysis) , Research Designs (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

This paper provides a critical evaluation of two nursing articles, one experimental and one non-experimental, with respect to the soundness of the stated research question and the research methodology employed to deliver the appropriate answer or answers to the stated question. The articles reviewed are: "Improving the Retention Rate of Newly Graduated Nurses", Pam Almanda, et al. (2004, non-experimental) and "Nurse Internship Pathway to Clinical Comfort, Confidence and Competency", Cheryl Blanzola, et. al. (2004, experimental).

From the Paper:

"Unfortunately the hypothesis stated by Blanzola and her two co-authors set forth a hypothesis that was not only in null form but one that predicted an increase in core competency attainment visa via internship participation. The reason a direction is not suitable for experimental research lies in the area of attempting to explain that which did not happened. Attempting to give reason as to why a treatment (nursing internship) did not happen is fraught with subjective explanations and akin to discussing how many angles can be placed on a head of a pin. In other words, there is no reasonable answer."

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

Nursing Articles Reviewed (2006, August 09) Retrieved February 28, 2024, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/nursing-articles-reviewed-68221/

MLA Format

"Nursing Articles Reviewed" 09 August 2006. Web. 28 February. 2024. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/nursing-articles-reviewed-68221/>

Comments