National Emergency Management in 5 Countries Analytical Essay by Top Papers

In this article, the writer examines national emergency management in Japan, United States, Canada, China and India. The writer compares the five cases, looks at significant laws used in each country, formulated in each country, and discusses what they reveal about national concerns and agendas. In Japan, the United States and Canada, man-made disasters, such as military aggression or terrorist assault, are highlighted as the chief factor influencing the development of a particular law or set of laws, whereas in China and India, the focus is upon naturally-occurring events which have laid waste to heavily-populated regions, creating massive human trauma as a result. Ultimately, the writer shows that, while the basic "mitigation," "vulnerability," and "recovery" considerations remain constant in every case, each nation responds rather differently depending upon its political, geographic and social needs, circumstances and imperatives. The writer concludes that what a nation believes is important when it comes time to assess possible threats plays as great a role as any set of variables in determining the allocation of finite resources.