Law and Economics Analytical Essay by Top Papers

Law and Economics
This paper looks at law and economics, examining the cases of Miller et al. v. Schoene (1928) and Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. (1970).
# 130568 | 1,000 words | 7 sources | MLA | 2006 | US
Published on Dec 01, 2006 in Law (Property) , Political Science (General) , Economics (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

In this article, the writer discusses that the cases of Miller et al. v. Schoene (1928) and Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. (1970) both touch upon similar issues in law and economics related to property and liability. The writer argues, in comparing and contrasting the rulings in the two cases, that in evaluating real world circumstances and cases the law does not reflect pure economic analysis of these questions but, rather, has tended to treat negative externalities by a liability rule as opposed to a property rule.

From the Paper:

"The case of Miller et al. v. Schoene represents a particularly interesting case given that the court was ruling on a case in which it had to balance ..."

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

Law and Economics (2006, December 01) Retrieved June 06, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/law-and-economics-130568/

MLA Format

"Law and Economics" 01 December 2006. Web. 06 June. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/law-and-economics-130568/>

Comments