Is Hume a Skeptic or a Cautious Naturalist? Analytical Essay by Top Papers

Is Hume a Skeptic or a Cautious Naturalist?
A discussion on whether Hume is a skeptic or a cautious naturalist.
# 144415 | 1,250 words | 2 sources | MLA | 2009 | US
Published on Dec 01, 2009 in Philosophy (Science) , Biology (General)


$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

The paper offers a definition for the idea of skepticism and the idea of naturalism. The paper asserts that it is unlikely that Hume was skeptical of all traditional thought, nor was he wholly focused on natural determinism. The paper explains that we can likely identify the idea of skepticism with respect to morality, and the idea of naturalism with respect to that with which we associate with Darwin, who was admittedly inspired by Hume: the survival of people, things and ideas determined through casual relations and evolution over time.

From the Paper:

"In addressing this question, it at first comes to bear that for Hume's sake we must start with at least a passing definition for the idea of skepticism and the idea of naturalism. It is unlikely that Hume was skeptical of all traditional thought, nor was he wholly focussed on natural determinism. We can likely identify the idea of skepticism with respect to morality, and the idea of naturalism with respect to that with which we associate with Darwin, who was admittedly inspired by Hume: the survival of people, things and ideas determined through casual relations and evolution over time."

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

Is Hume a Skeptic or a Cautious Naturalist? (2009, December 01) Retrieved May 23, 2022, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/is-hume-a-skeptic-or-a-cautious-naturalist-144415/

MLA Format

"Is Hume a Skeptic or a Cautious Naturalist?" 01 December 2009. Web. 23 May. 2022. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/is-hume-a-skeptic-or-a-cautious-naturalist-144415/>

Comments