Dualistic Interactionism: Disproved by Physicalism?
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The paper discusses an oft-mentioned argument against dualistic interactionism that is that a material object and an immaterial object, if the latter exists at all, cannot have a rational causal relationship. The paper explains that physicalists wonder how dualistic interactionists can imply that the mental and physical, for example, exist in a connected relationship. The paper looks at a good example of an accepted causal relationship between two physical objects that is the action of a pool cue striking a pool ball, which, once moving, then knocks another ball into a pool table pocket. The paper discusses how according to physicalists, this can be easily explained, as objects in the causal relationship are of the same properties: physical ones.
From the Paper:"There are a number of arguments against dualistic interactionism. The primary concern leveled at the particular school of philosophy is that it is very difficult (some say impossible) to understand how a material and an immaterial object can interact in a causal manner. The Argument Against Dualistic Interactionism: An oft-mentioned argument against dualistic interactionism is that a material object and an immaterial object, if the latter exists at all (as physicalists reject), cannot have a rational causal relationship."
Cite this Analytical Essay:
Dualistic Interactionism: Disproved by Physicalism? (2007, December 01) Retrieved May 30, 2020, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/dualistic-interactionism-disproved-by-physicalism-134217/
"Dualistic Interactionism: Disproved by Physicalism?" 01 December 2007. Web. 30 May. 2020. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/dualistic-interactionism-disproved-by-physicalism-134217/>