Criminal Liability and Defenses Analytical Essay by Quality Writers

Criminal Liability and Defenses
A discussion on criminal liability cases and the noted defenses to each.
# 105241 | 3,098 words | 20 sources | APA | 2008 | US

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


The paper begins with an overview of how criminal liability is measured in terms of the degrees and principles surrounding liability. The crux of the paper, however, concentrates on aspects of the legal framework that provide defenses to criminal liability. This analysis is then supported with a theoretical framework and findings from the literature that are used to provide thorough analyses related to defenses to criminal liability.

Legal Framework of Criminal Liability
Strict Liability and the Defense
Justification of Criminal Conduct
Criminal Liability

From the Paper:

"The criminal liability relationship highlighted within the paper and later presented with examples for defenses to criminal liability is affected by differences related to types of crimes; such as, criminal conduct and true crimes. That is, the degree of liability within the former does not require all of the principles to be upheld while with the latter it is necessary that the corpus delicti rule holds. As such the measures of criminal liability are different across categories and may not be easily quantified in the relationship outlined in the equation specified throughout the paper. An example of the former is a burglary while of the latter its homicide, the difference within these two crimes is a clear indication of why criminal liability is not a trivial issue and why it is not always a direct relationship and how defenses can be formulated within the legal context (Schellenger & Wittmer, 2003, p. 1).
In the general scenario, the degree of liability can be easily established via culpability, capacity, and responsibility along with the five principles highlighted, however the logical structure of criminal liability is not as simple as the formula above highlights but has different scenarios and principles that will affect how the law is quantified or how the degree of criminal liability is measured."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Bailyn, E. (n.d.). Strict liability. Choose Law Articles. Retrieved August 21, 2007, from
  • Beaney, W. (1955). The right to counsel in american courts. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
  • Bowett, D. (January 1960). Self-defense in international law. The American Journal of International Law, 54(1), 199-201.
  • Dopuch, N. & King, R. (1992, January). Negligence versus strict liability regimes in auditing: An experimental investigation, The Accounting Review, 67(1), 97-120.
  • Epstein, L. & T. Walker. (2001). Constitutional law for a changing America. Washington: CQ Press.

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

Criminal Liability and Defenses (2008, July 02) Retrieved May 08, 2021, from

MLA Format

"Criminal Liability and Defenses" 02 July 2008. Web. 08 May. 2021. <>