Examines cocaine industry, sentencing disparity for powder & crack cocaine offenders, & federal law biased against African-Americans.
# 13006 | 1,350 words | 7 sources | 1997 |
Published on Feb 03, 2003 in African-American Studies (1950-Present) , Criminology (Drugs Enforcement) , Criminology (Criminal Justice and Corrections)
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
From the Paper:"The sentencing disparity between convictions for crack cocaine and powder cocaine is discriminatory toward African-Americans. Federal policy is responsible for this disparity, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 and Public Law 104-38 (Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Amendment, Disapproval) being the most significant contributors. Differences in the consumption and marketing patterns of crack cocaine and powder cocaine do not justify stiffer penalties. Ironically, the inequitable sentencing of African-Americans has done little to remedy the problem of cocaine trafficking in the United States.
Government officials justify the disparity in sentencing between powder cocaine and crack cocaine based on the devastating effect that the latter drug exerts at the community level. According to testimony at a recent Congressional hearing.."
Cite this Analytical Essay:
Cocaine Sentencing (2003, February 03) Retrieved September 22, 2019, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/cocaine-sentencing-13006/
"Cocaine Sentencing" 03 February 2003. Web. 22 September. 2019. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/cocaine-sentencing-13006/>