Beneficence vs Non-Malfeasance
$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
In this article, the writer discusses that ethical interactions with a patient are all about the gray areas if a nurse allows herself to practice medicine without objectivity. Even ethically there should be no gray areas in nursing. The writer maintains that the nurse has a responsibility to treat the whole patient, but not place any value, moral judgments or beliefs in the course of treatment. The writer points out that the nurse's function is to assess and treat. This is black and white just like the legal issues are black and white. The writer concludes that in medicine there are no gray areas.
From the Paper:""Beneficence: Who benefits from my action and in what way?" "Non-Malfeasance: Which parties may be harmed by my action? What steps can I take to minimize this harm? Have I communicated risks involved in a truthful and open manner? In the event of a disaster, how can I avert the possible harm caused?" Establish the facts: ..."
Cite this Analytical Essay:
Beneficence vs Non-Malfeasance (2007, December 01) Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/beneficence-vs-non-malfeasance-136315/
"Beneficence vs Non-Malfeasance" 01 December 2007. Web. 21 January. 2021. <https://www.academon.com/analytical-essay/beneficence-vs-non-malfeasance-136315/>