Beneficence vs Non-Malfeasance Analytical Essay by Top Papers

Beneficence vs Non-Malfeasance
This paper discusses beneficence and non-malfeasance focusing on the field of nursing.
# 136315 | 2,500 words | 10 sources | APA | 2007 | US
Published on Dec 01, 2007 in Medical and Health (Nursing) , Philosophy (Ethics) , Ethics (General)

$19.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now


In this article, the writer discusses that ethical interactions with a patient are all about the gray areas if a nurse allows herself to practice medicine without objectivity. Even ethically there should be no gray areas in nursing. The writer maintains that the nurse has a responsibility to treat the whole patient, but not place any value, moral judgments or beliefs in the course of treatment. The writer points out that the nurse's function is to assess and treat. This is black and white just like the legal issues are black and white. The writer concludes that in medicine there are no gray areas.

From the Paper:

""Beneficence: Who benefits from my action and in what way?" "Non-Malfeasance: Which parties may be harmed by my action? What steps can I take to minimize this harm? Have I communicated risks involved in a truthful and open manner? In the event of a disaster, how can I avert the possible harm caused?" Establish the facts: ..."

Cite this Analytical Essay:

APA Format

Beneficence vs Non-Malfeasance (2007, December 01) Retrieved April 12, 2024, from

MLA Format

"Beneficence vs Non-Malfeasance" 01 December 2007. Web. 12 April. 2024. <>