Abstract
This paper explains that the Emery Barnes Park is one of three parks in the downtown south region of Vancouver, which are intended to bring 4.5 acres of park space to the residents of the area. The author points out that the cultivation of the landscape matches the up-market culture of the region. The paper describes the elegant lines, modern architectural touches and elegant old-world stone structures, which characterize this landscape. The author relates that, despite some old world touches, the atmosphere of the park creates a feeling of modernism with its forward-looking view of the world, which focuses on reason, scientific rationality, creativity, progress and novelty. The paper states that the park is named for Emery Barnes, a longtime community activist who was chosen to represent the park because of his commitment to human rights and helping the disadvantaged, a big part of Canada's liberal cultural policy. The paper includes color photos.

From the Paper
"Perhaps many years ago the region may have been somewhat derelict, or at the very least ordinary: the urbanization of the downtown region has replaced some fairly seedy regions, which still exist on the east side of the downtown area. The park's structure is notable because it is very open. Residents in the area typically live in condos or apartments, and therefore have no back yard or natural space to enjoy. Emery Barnes Park therefore operates as a place of relaxation and enjoyment of both natural and man-made beauty. The green grass gives the urban residents the chance to walk on green lawn, bare foot if they wish to."

Tags:up-market, modernism, activist, urbanization, relaxation

Abstract
This paper explains that, in contemporary American society, the use of images to learn history has been under-valued as exemplified by the relative under-appreciation for the art of John Trumbull, an American painter, architect and author, whose paintings of major episodes in the U.S. War of Independence form a unique record of that conflict's events and participants. The author points out that Trumbull's most famous work is his documentary painting, "The Declaration of Independence", finished in 1836, which is a familiar image in American popular iconography. The paper describes in detail the paintings "Declaration of Independence", "The Surrender of Cornwallis at Yorktown" and "The Battle of Bunker's Hill"; each of these paintings realistically depicts not only the scenes but also the historically correct portraiture of the participants.

Table of Contents
Introduction
Biography Information
Early life
Painting Career
"The Declaration of Independence"
Avenues of Fame
Misnaming
Description of Painting
Portraiture
Thomas Jefferson
John Adams
Benjamin Franklin
Members of Congress
Actual Scene
"Surrender of Cornwallis at Yorktown"
Description of Painting
Portraitures
Cornwallis
O'Hara
General Lincoln
Actual Scene
"The Battle of Bunker's Hill"
Description of Painting
Portraiture
General Putnam
British Officers
Howe
Clinton
Small
Pitcairn
Actual Scene
Conclusion

From the Paper
""The Battle of Bunker's Hill" is also among Trumbull's most famous paintings. This painting is composed of many figures in close combat, and the painting's organization lies along a sweeping diagonal. Moreover, the dramatic contrasts of light and shadow movingly culminate in the highlighted soldier dying in the arms of a comrade.This was the first of Trumbull's Revolutionary War masterpieces to be finished, and it was also painted in the studio of Benjamin West in London. It was completed in March 1786, although the origin of the portraiture in this painting is less known than that of the two aforementioned Revolutionary War paintings. For example, it is unknown where Trumbull obtained the likeness of General Warren, although it is probable that he copied a portrait by Copley."

Tags:record, documentary, scenes, portraiture, under-valued

Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that the revolutionary forces during the American War of Independence received substantial aid from many European states and that one of the largest contributors of aid was France. This paper discusses how important the French role was in the rebel victory. It does this through analyzing the French contribution to the victory at Yorktown, the French logistical and financial contributions to the rebel forces and the strategic implications of France's entry into the war in 1780. Through this research it is found that the French contribution to the rebel war effort was fundamental to its ultimate victory over British forces. The writer concludes that that the French aid to the revolutionary forces was decisive in the Rebel victory over the British.

From the Paper
"The American War of Independence officially ended in 1783 with the revolutionary forces under Washington taking the victory. However, the war was not entirely won by Washington and his forces. Indeed, the revolutionary forces had aid from a number of European states. The most critical of this aid came from France, both before and after it officially entered the war. How important was this French intervention in the struggle of the American colonies against Britain? This paper will argue that French aid to the revolutionary forces was decisive in the Rebel victory over the British. This will be done through looking at three key aspects of French aid during the war: Firstly, the decisiveness of the 1781 battle of Yorktown and the degree to which that victory was owing to the French military forces. Secondly, the financial and logistical assistance given by France to the Rebel forces, and the effects thereof. Lastly, the strategic implications for the British of the French entry into the war in 1780."

Tags:revolutionary, war, Washington, military, army, marines

Abstract
This paper examines how there was a certain inevitability about the American victory in the war against the British. It shows how it was a war of ideas based on natural rights philosophy and how the people wanted to change the world of lords and kings and were not going to give up. It looks at how the colonial militia had spirit and fortitude, and with their new war tactics, they held their own against the red coats. It discusses how the British themselves faced many practical difficulties. It analyzes how the Americans' moves were designed and coordinated, while poor communication and indecisiveness hindered the planning of the British. It also discusses the campaign of 1777, the Battle of Bunker Hill and the defeat at York Town.

From the Paper
"Even though the American army was small compared to the British, but their military tactics and skills were excellent. The British firing techniques were also not effective. The commanders lined up their troops in lines, one line in front of the other. Then, the British soldiers fired, knelt down, and then reloaded their weapons. While the British were standing in the open, the Americans used guerrilla tactics and fired upon the redcoats while using the trees as protection. Almost defenseless to this American technique, the British lost many soldiers. The Americans knew how to fight effectively with their limited troops. Prussian soldier Steuben's training program was designed to equip American troops to fight in European fashion with modifications to provide for the increased use of light infantry."

Tags:1777, bunker, campaign, defeat, french, general, hill, howe, yorktown