A discussion of the positive and negative aspects of internet research.
Essay # 86542 |
900 words (
approx. 3.6 pages ) |
10 sources |
2005
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper explores the concept of Internet research for writing. The paper delves into the positive aspects of Internet research, such as web sites that are effective in aiding the researcher, and the options available on the World Wide Web. The paper further explores the negative elements of Internet research to include Internet addiction, reputable sites, and plagiarism. The paper provides evidence of the research, and draws conclusions based on factual material.
Tags:web, research, internet
A step-by step guide of how to write a good research or term paper.
Creative Essay # 8629 |
2,720 words (
approx. 10.9 pages ) |
10 sources |
MLA | 2002
|
$ 48.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper considers how to write an essay. It discusses good preparation and content as well structure and general research rules. It reviews each topic in turn from how to write an introduction to how to wrote a bibliography.
From the Paper
"A paragraph should like the complete essay be clear, cohesive and organized each must have a central theme that is always stated in the first sentence of the paragraph. Body paragraph sentences are used to provide different formats of data each is in its own way beneficial to the systemic way of stringing paragraphs together to form essays, clear examples of this would be in the provision of reasons for a particular view point, solid details, major examples, facts, or incidents and anecdotes. By using any of the above examples either collectively or individually the student will be able to provide suitable paragraphs that will support either the topic or thesis statement."
Tags:introduction, methodology, triangulation, conclusion, bibliography
An analysis of the ethical implications of stem cell research.
Argumentative Essay # 62440 |
2,695 words (
approx. 10.8 pages ) |
15 sources |
MLA | 2005
$ 48.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper is a critical survey of the ethical arguments both for and against stem cell technology. It examines the validity of both arguments, based on Ronald Dworkin's (2002) ethical writings on "The Sanctity of Life" and John Rawls' (2002) "Theory of Justice."
In the conclusion, this paper argues that because of the potential for stem cell research to benefit millions of people, the ban on creating stem cells for research should be lifted. Furthermore, this paper argues that the government should extend federal funding for this potentially life-saving research. After all, the heart of the debate over stem cells is not whether this technology will save lives, but whether biomedical research in general should be limited by the unfounded ethical concerns or religious beliefs of some of the country's citizens.
From the Paper
"The main argument against using embryonic stem cells, however, remains a moral one. Opponents decry how harvesting the embryonic stem cell invariably destroys the embryo, which they contend, should enjoy the same protections as human beings. After all, as Sullivan(2001) argues, an embryo is a human being in its purest form . Whether an embryo looks "human" or not is beside the point, state many critics of embryonic stem cell research. While people may not oppose the use of early embryos because they do not appear to be human, the simple fact is that all humans look that way at five or 15 days of development. A human embryo is a human being nonetheless (Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity 2001)."
Tags:embryo, human, technology
This paper explores the steps involved in writing a successful research report.
Research Paper # 106133 |
6,473 words (
approx. 25.9 pages ) |
16 sources |
MLA | 2008
|
$ 89.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper discusses how writing a research report begins with the selection of a topic and the research of information. The paper relates that writers often outline what they are going to do and then make changes later on. The paper also points out that there are different levels and types of writing and the form of the report, the wording and the tone may depend on what type of report is being written. Additionally, the paper refers to various sources that offer advice on writing and language styles.
Outline:
Introduction
Organizing the Topic
Research
The Writing Process
Other Elements to be Considered
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Writing a report can be achieved in several different ways, but there are certain steps every writer should consider and that may help the writer focus on a topic, develop the evidence needed, and shape the written report to follow. In general terms, the writing process begins with the selection of a subject about which to write. Sometimes the subject is assigned, while at other times it must be selected from something that interests the writer or that he or she thinks they can explain in an interesting way. This is more than just the beginning of the process--it is one of the most important parts of the process because it decides much of what will be done next. If the writer chooses a subject that is too hard to understand, he or she will not be able to explain it to someone else."
Tags:language, reader, audience, style, tone, sentences
An examination of the process of writing a research paper.
Analytical Essay # 59631 |
911 words (
approx. 3.6 pages ) |
3 sources |
MLA | 2004
|
$ 19.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper presents guidelines for writing a research paper. The paper contends that writing a research paper involves five simple yet important steps: focusing the topic, conducting thorough research, writing a first draft, revising the draft into a well-written composition, and creating a properly formatted final composition. The paper elaborates on each of these five steps.
From the Paper
"Research papers will haunt all students during the course of their educational careers and beyond, depending on their career. Although writing a research paper is never easy, and demands hard work, time, and patience, the task need not be daunting. The process of writing a research paper entails five major steps. First, start with a narrow and focused topic in the area of interest. One of the main mistakes made by beginning writers is attempting to tackle a topic that is too broad. The best research papers have a clear focus and a thesis statement that summarizes it. Second, do all the requisite footwork such as locating bibliographic materials and conducting searches using the Internet and electronic databases. Ideally, all reference materials for the paper should be reputable if not peer-reviewed, from scholastic sources. Blogs might be good starting points for finding initial topics but do not constitute reliable source material. The third stage in the research paper writing process involves the composition of a primary draft. Getting thoughts down on paper without worrying about sounding erudite removes self-censorship and helps the writer overcome mental blocks."
Tags:essay, student, university, project
A comparison between research writing and writing aimed at non-scholarly audiences, through a close examination of articles by Carol S. Dweck and John O'Sullivan.
Comparison Essay # 102857 |
1,070 words (
approx. 4.3 pages ) |
3 sources |
MLA | 2008
|
$ 22.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper examines the differences between research writing and writing for a non-scholarly audience. The paper points out that the most obvious difference is that the former can be very difficult to read, but the latter is almost always relatively easy to read. However, there are many subtler stylistic differences as well. This essay examines the differences between the two styles of writing, by comparing Carol S. Dweck's research article entitled "The Role of Expectations and Attributions in the Alleviation of Learned Helplessness" with her popular article "Caution - Praise Can Be Dangerous", and with John O'Sullivan's popular article "Put Gay Marriage to 'Covenant' Test". To conclude, the paper examines the reliability of academic versus popular articles. The paper maintains that the former are peer-reviewed, making them likely to be more trustworthy, while popular articles are not necessarily trustworthy.
From the Paper
"One sometimes comes across articles written by the same authors, but written in different styles in order to suit the kind of article being written. Thus, a researcher may write a research article for a scholarly publication, and also write articles for popular audiences. In this way, the researcher is enabled to communicate with a much broader audience. Thus, a researcher who believes her information is very important may make use of the popular media to communicate what she knows. Dweck is an example of such a researcher/author - she is able to write very competently for both audiences. This shows that she clearly has a finely nuanced comprehension of the different stylistic devices employed in the two different kinds of publications. It also affords the opportunity of comparing her writing style in the two different styles of writing."
Tags:academic, non-academic, layperson, popular, journalism
A look at some differences between research writing and writing for a non-scholarly audience.
Analytical Essay # 132742 |
1,000 words (
approx. 4 pages ) |
4 sources |
MLA |
|
$ 21.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper discusses the substantial stylistic differences between research writing and writing for a non-scholarly audience. According to the paper, the most obvious difference is that the former can be very difficult to read, but the latter are almost always relatively easy to read.
From the Paper
"There are substantial stylistic differences between research writing and writing for a non-scholarly audience. This reflects the fact that they are written for very different audiences - the former for scholars and researchers, and the latter for the broader public. The most obvious difference is that the former can be very difficult to read, but the latter are almost always relatively easy to read. However, there are many subtler stylistic differences as well. This essay examines the differences between the two styles of writing, by comparing Carol S. Dweck's research article entitled "The Role of Expectations and Attributions in the..."
Tags:academic, popular, compare
A guide for writing a research paper.
Admission Essay # 8176 |
1,160 words (
approx. 4.6 pages ) |
5 sources |
APA | 2002
|
$ 23.95
More information
|
New! Look inside the paper
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper describes the elements and process in writing a research paper. The author writes in the manner of teaching a method and ethics of academic writing.
Table of Contents
Choosing a Topic
Finding a Topic
Specific Topic
List of Topics
Random Topic
Gathering Data
Data Sources
Where to Find Data
How to use Data
Plagiarism
Define It
From the Paper
"The most important aspect of doing a research paper is choosing the topic. Sometimes the professor has already chosen the topic. Other times there may be a list of topics from which the student is free to choose. There also may be times that the research paper may be a topic exclusively of the students choosing. Once a topic is chosen it should be narrowed down, for example if the topic is "Education," the focus may be streamlined to "Elementary Education." It is important not to pick a subject that is too advanced for the writer and avoid subjects where data is not readily accessible."
Tags:plagiarism, topic, streamline, data, sources, gatherspelling, grammar, logical
A student's reflection on the process of researching and writing.
Term Paper # 140365 |
750 words (
approx. 3 pages ) |
0 sources |
|
$ 16.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
This paper is a reflection of the research process for a student. The student discusses how an important part of researching and writing essays focuses on knowing how to use the American Psychological Association (APA) style of citations and references. The student shows how the research process offers many challenges that require strategies that enable the researcher to create research papers.
From the Paper
"Learning the process of researching and writing can be frightening and challenging. Finding the right sources and summarizing or paraphrasing these sources can be frightening until the researcher knows and understands how to do these steps. An important part of researching and writing essays focuses on knowing how to use the American Psychological Association (APA) style of citations and references. The research process offers many challenges that require strategies that enable the researcher to create research papers. The challenges that I faced during the research were learning how to..."
Tags:paraphrase, summarize, grammar
A critical review of the article "Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients" by Van de Berghe et al.
Article Review # 107495 |
2,454 words (
approx. 9.8 pages ) |
8 sources |
APA | 2008
|
$ 44.95
More information
|
Add to cart
Abstract
The paper examines the article "Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients" wherein a group of critically ill patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups to determine if normal blood glucose levels would improve the prognosis by use of insulin therapy. The paper focuses on the research's substantive qualities, design qualities and quality of presentation and writing. The paper includes the article as an appendix to the paper.
Outline:
Introduction
Substantive Qualities
Study Design Qualities
From the Paper
"Fairly critiquing an investigator's research endeavor is a task that must be taken seriously. Although it is quite easy to have an opinion of another's research it is something quite different to be able to evaluate the research activity in terms of topic specificity and soundness, intent or purpose, data analysis, and informational importance. When embarking upon a critical analysis of another's work the reviewer must, at all times, adhere to the basic principle of prudent evaluation; namely, evaluating the structure of the research upon which scientific conclusion are drawn."
Tags:blood, glucose, substantive, design, presentation, writing