Qualitative vs. Quantitative Approaches to Theory Research Paper by Writing Specialists

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Approaches to Theory
An analysis of D. Center and D, Kemp's work, "Troubled Children Grown Up: Antisocial Behavior in Young Adult Criminals" as it relates to qualitative vs. quantitative approaches to theory in criminology.
# 91567 | 2,877 words | 10 sources | MLA | 2007 | US


$59.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now

Description:

This study involves an in-depth analysis of qualitative vs. quantitative approaches to theory in criminology. Specifically, the paper weighs the relative merits of qualitative vs. quantitative approaches to research design in criminology. The author assumes that a quantitative approach is more likely to yield useful results in the field and that researchers should focus their attention on quantitative based research practices. To carry out this goal the paper provides an in-depth analysis of Center & Kemp's work, "Troubled Children Grown Up: Antisocial Behavior in Young Adult Criminals."

Table of Contents:
Abstract
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Hypothesis
Background/Rationale
Literature Review
Methodology
Statistical Analysis
Data Collection
Conclusions/Discussion
Recommendation

From the Paper:

"Center & Kemp use two-way ANOVA to evaluate the results of their research related to antisocial behavior in young adults. The data collect includes principal analysis employing fixed categorical variables defined as "official conviction offense and self-reported antisocial behavior on the NYS." The results of the study yielded a significant effect. The researchers compared the parolee sample with norms established for the survey instruments collected, using multiple t-tests to control for Type I errors. Significant differences were identified between the parolee group with norms, suggesting that personality traits and biological factors may impact young adults ability to integrate and demonstrate antisocial behaviors at a later date."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • Center, D. & Kemp, D. (2000). "Troubled children grown up: Antisocial behavior in young adult criminals." Education & Treatment of Children, 23(3): 223.
  • Cohn, E.G., Farrington, D.P. & Wright, R.A. (1998). Evaluating criminology and criminal justice. London: Greenwood Press.
  • Einstadter, W. & Henry, S. (1995). Criminological Theory: An analysis of its underlying assumptions. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  • Farrington, D.P. (2003). "Methodological quality standards for evaluation research." ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587:1: 49-68. http://ann.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/587/1/49
  • Farrington, D.P., Mackenzie, D.L., Sherman, L.W. & Welsh, B.C. (2002). Evidence based crime prevention. London: Routledge.

Cite this Research Paper:

APA Format

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Approaches to Theory (2007, January 31) Retrieved April 23, 2014, from http://www.academon.com/research-paper/qualitative-vs-quantitative-approaches-to-theory-91567/

MLA Format

"Qualitative vs. Quantitative Approaches to Theory" 31 January 2007. Web. 23 April. 2014. <http://www.academon.com/research-paper/qualitative-vs-quantitative-approaches-to-theory-91567/>

Comments