Climate Change: Science and Skepticism
$39.95 Buy and instantly download this paper now
The paper analyzes the positions of two researchers who are opposed on their views of climate change. The paper specifically considers their positions in light of several significant differences the two have, primarily on the issue of computer modeling. The paper notes that S. Fred Singer, an atmospheric physicist at George Mason University, when referring to global warming, argues that "the scenarios are alarmist, computer models reflect real gaps in climate knowledge, and future warming will be inconsequential or modest at most". The paper comments that the opposer is Tom Wigley, a climatologist and senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research who commands a wide array of evidence to support his claims regarding climate change. The paper considers the position of each on the issues of computer modeling and the potential impact of climate change, drawing on outside research to demonstrate which position has the greater likelihood of being correct.
Sample of Sources Used:
- Bailey, Ronald. "Why Meaning?" Reason (Apr. 2004): 10-12.
- "First Test of Predictions of Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity." Space Daily (15 July 2005): NA. General OneFile. Gale. 27 Nov. 2007 <http://find.galegroup.com>.
- "New Observations Confirm Recent Warming of the Tropical Atmosphere." Space Daily (15 Aug. 2005): NA. General OneFile. Gale. 27 Nov. 2007 http://find.galegroup.com.
- Singer, S. Fred. Interview. What's Up with the Weather?. PBS. Apr. 2000.
- Wigley, Tom M. Interview. What's Up with the Weather?. PBS. Apr. 2000.
Cite this Research Paper:
Climate Change: Science and Skepticism (2008, December 04) Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://www.academon.com/research-paper/climate-change-science-and-skepticism-109669/
"Climate Change: Science and Skepticism" 04 December 2008. Web. 30 May. 2016. <http://www.academon.com/research-paper/climate-change-science-and-skepticism-109669/>