Abstract This policy paper analyzes the capital murder statute in Texas and discusses the existence of particular problems concerning two aspects of the manner in which capitalpunishment is administered: the definition of capital murder and the ways in which capital murder cases are administered. With respect to the multi-part series of articles published in the Houston Chronicle regarding the use of capitalpunishment in Harris County, this paper briefly touches on several examples of significant problems surrounding the way capitalpunishment is administered there.
From the Paper "Capital punishment is a highly contentious issue in the realm of law enforcement. In any discussion of the death penalty, the state of Texas tends to be a primary focus due to the fact that Texas carries out far more executions than any other American state. "
Abstract This paper explores the relationship between race and capitalpunishment. Specifically the researcher explores the racial differences in attitudes toward capitalpunishment, focusing on juvenile opinions. The paper examines factors affecting views on capitalpunishment, arguments for and against, attitudes towards the death penalty and provides a review of the literature used in the paper.
Outline:
Introduction
Literature
What Predicts Death Penalty Support?
Arguments For and Against Death Penalty
Public Opinion and Attitudes
Death Penalty Attitudes of the Offender
Death Penalty Attitudes of Juveniles
Summary of the Literature
Discussion
Conclusion
References
From the Paper "Attitudes among juveniles regarding capital punishment are just as heated and challenging as they are among adults. While few studies directly explore the relationship between the death penalty and juveniles, there are reports provided by some empirical researchers suggesting by and large, the juvenile population is just as divided as the American people are on the issue. As noted in the introduction, the Death Penalty Information Center (2006) suggests at least 50% of all adults support the death penalty. However, the same group when offered other alternatives including the alternative of life without parole are likely to change their minds and their opinions of the death penalty. In ancient times, most people unequivocally supported the death penalty, as there were few resources available to conduct elaborate or even minimal burials to individuals that had committed crimes (Bedau & Cassell, 2004)."
Abstract This paper examines the arguments for and against capitalpunishment. It provides ample evidence suggesting that capitalpunishment is an inappropriate form of punishment that does little to address the underlying causes of social unrest and violence.
From the Paper "The debate about capital punishment has long been a heated one. Supporters argue that capital punishment offers a form of deterrence; they also argue that it is a form of justice that underscores a society's abhorrence for gruesome acts. On the other hand, opponents argue that capital punishment does not serve an adequate deterrent and still others suggest that capital punishment barbarizes the state and constitutes a moral regression for any putatively progressive society. The following paper will briefly examine both sides and conclude that capital punishment does not serve as an effective deterrent and does little to address the root factors that cause violence. With that in mind, it is do a discussion of this controversial issue that this paper now turns."
Abstract This paper examines the sociological arguments for and against capitalpunishment policy in the United States. It looks at capitalpunishment as proportionate justice and as a divisive issue in the United States.
Tags:capitalpunishment, death penalty, sociology, conflict theory, interactionist theory, amnesty, human rights
Abstract In this paper, it is discussed that capitalpunishment should be implemented along the lines of rational thought, as well as by the dictates of utilitarianism that requires death for murder. The writer maintains that when a rational human being decides to consciously kill another, he or she must be treated with equal punishment in relation to this kind of crime. However, the writer notes that if the criminal is not fully aware of what they have done, or not conscious of the murder, then they should be punished by imprisonment for rehabilitation.
From the Paper "This philosophical will argue for capital punishment for violent offenders who murdered another human being. By understanding the premise of Kant's Theory of Retribution, one must assume that murderers assume their victim's are rational beings, and should thus be responsible for their punishment on equal terms. Through Kant's philosophy, this study will argue the basis of rationality within the human scope, which will confirm that capital punishment must be used to punish those that murder others. By presenting a case for rationality, as well as an argument based utilitarian justice, there are two reasons why capital punishment is just means to punish those that take the life of another human being."
Abstract This paper notes that in the United States capitalpunishment is a very controversial issue for it involves complex ethical, judicial, social, economic, racial, and political issues. As the debate over capitalpunishment has raged in recent decades a number of primary questions have been raised. This paper reviews those questions.
From the Paper " Is capital punishment morally right? Is taking a convicted criminal's life an effective means of deterring other criminals from committing violent crimes that mandate a death penalty sentence? Is capital punishment applied fairly, regardless of social, economic, or racial factors, or are most of the death row inmates executed in the United States poor, uneducated members of minority groups? These questions have dominated the debate over capital punishment in recent decades and are difficult to answer conclusively. "
Abstract This paper explores and presents numerous issues associated with capitalpunishment. First, the writer details which countries still use this method of punishment and for what crimes. The paper further discusses methods of execution in the US, which states use the death penalty, and how race affects sentencing. The author also explores the various philosophical moral views of this issue, presenting both sides of the issue.
From the Paper "There were many methods of execution in the United States and the early colonies from 1608 to 2004 (Wikipedia 2006). Electrocution took the place of hangings and the gas chamber, burning, pressing, gibbeting or hanging in chains, breaking on wheel and bludgeoning. The current method is lethal injection, which is used or allowed in 37 or 38 States where the death penalty is recognized and in the federal government. From 1976 to 2006, 861 out of 1,026 executions have been by lethal injection, 152 by electrocution, 11 by gas chamber, 3 by hanging and 2 by firing squad. The malfunctioning and the cruelty of the electric chair led to the opting of lethal injection as a major method of execution. Whatever the method chosen, an hour or two before the execution, the convict is offered a last meal and religious services. Executions are performed in private with only invited individuals to witness the proceedings. The last to be publicly executed was Rainey Bethea on August 14, 1936 in Owensboro, Kentucky (Wikipedia)."
Abstract This paper presents an argument in favor of the death penalty after first reviewing arguments both opposing and supporting it. The paper also discusses the history of capitalpunishment, looks at issues of racial bias and discusses public opinion of the topic.
.
From the Paper "The debate over capital punishment has for many decades been a fixture on the American political agenda. To a majority of Americans, capital punishment is seen as necessary to retaliate against and punish those who commit crimes, especially vicious and brutal murders. To other American, capital punishment is seen as nothing more than an excessively violent response to violence that does not effectively deter crime and which is essentially cruel, unusual and inhumane punishment. These opposing viewpoints reflect..."
Tags:capitalpunishment, death penalty, criminal justice
Abstract This paper examines the issues surrounding capitalpunishment, arguing many dimensions of the debate. It describes the concept of capitalpunishment as a death penalty to the persons found guilty of committing a crime, most often a homicidal crime. The paper raises many important questions with respect to the moral, religious and practical perspectives.
From the Paper "Majority of the people believe that the judiciary system should not grant any mercy to the criminals or grant justice to them, once they are proved guilty of committing crime. The punishment being awarded to the guilty usually differs from state to state, according to the laws of the state but in most of the states the homicidal criminal is sentenced to death. However, many people believe that awarding a death sentence should not be considered as an option to punish the homicidal criminals."
Abstract This paper explains that the United States and Japan are the only highly advanced industrialized countries that have retained capitalpunishment. The author points out that Japan has a death penalty but uses it sparingly, executing two or three prisoners a year; many Japanese psychologists agree that the death penalty provides a psychic release from the pressure and degradation of conformity, repression and overwork and is an effective tool for instilling fear in police interrogations. The paper relates that the death penalty in these countries is approached differently: The United States, through its constitutional rights, has facilitated a plethora of information to support or abolish the death penalty; whereas, Japan offers minimal information about this issue to the general public.
Table of Contents
Japan: The Death Penalty
Abolitionists of the Death Penalty
United States: CapitalPunishment
From the Paper "As previously mentioned, Japan does support capital punishment. "The Japanese Penal Code lists 13 crimes that identify the death penalty as an appropriate sanction, and an additional five are sited in other statues." The Prime Minister's Office reported that a survey has revealed that almost 80 percent of people polled nationwide, up from 74 percent in 1994, expressed approval for Japan's continuation of the use of capital punishment. The figure is an all-time high among six such polls conducted since 1956. Results of the poll, which were conducted after a five-year lapse and covered 5,000 men and women aged 20 years or older, also showed that support for scrapping the death penalty has dipped to a mere 8 percent. This is the first time the figure has fallen below the 10 percent mark."
Abstract This paper examines the evolution of capitalpunishment in the United States. The paper explains that the practice of capitalpunishment in the United States had its origins in England and that the debate over the morality of capitalpunishment is a long standing one. The paper further explains that attitudes regarding capitalpunishment shifted over time as well as the reasons it was used. The paper discusses capitalpunishment policy during both World Wars, the Vietnam war and in present times and briefly compares President George W. Bush's policy on capitalpunishment to that of Thomas Jefferson.
From the Paper "It is tempting, on assessing the media coverage in the United States today, to think that the debate about capital punishment is one of relatively recent origin. However, the debate originated about the same time the United States became a group of recognizable colonies with common, if still somewhat amorphous, codes of morality and ethics. Arguably, it originated earlier than that, in the England from which most American settlers came; the death penalty had long been written into English law although, as Levi notes (2002, p. 131), it was rarely carried out because the structure of government was such-with its dependence on the good will (or ill will) of the nobility-that there was much latitude in its application."
Abstract This paper looks at how the amount of crime increases every day and how governments are working over time to fight this disaster and reduce it. It shows how some countries adopt capitalpunishment as one of the best ways of deterring crime and how others that have abolished capitalpunishment are trying to show the negligible effect of this kind of punishment. It examines how the United States of America, the only western country that uses death penalty suffers from a huge amount of offense from other countries. It evaluates how statistics have proved that there is no real positive effect with capitalpunishment and what makes capitalpunishment ineffective are errors in judgments such as lack of justice and natural mistakes.
From the Paper "In addition, the positive effects of death penalty on rate of crime are not proved. For many years it was thought that capital punishment is a deterrence of crime but later, when statistics became expanded, statisticians express that the idea that states with capital punishment have a lower crime rate is wrong. McManus (1998) expresses that states without the death penalty have fewer homicides than states those use death penalty. Massachusetts that has been abolished the death penalty, as an example, has the fewest crime rates in the United States of America (McManus, M., 1998). Similarly, Bonner and Fessenden (2000) illustrate that during the last twenty years, the rate of murder in states with capital punishment has been forty eight percent to more than one hundred percent higher than states with no capital punishment."
Abstract The author of the paper examines capitalpunishment, which has been a part of human culture since the 18th century B.C. The writer looks at the development of capitalpunishment over the ages and at the gradual influence and success of reform groups in different countries that called for the abolition of the death penalty. The writer also discusses the varying schools of thought regarding the legitimacy and effectiveness of capitalpunishment.
From the Paper "Critics of capital punishment conclude that if there is no good reason for executing a criminal he should be allowed to live. In the legal philosophy it can be said that defenses of capital punishment either have utilitarian or retributive nature. If seen from a utilitarian point of view capital punishment is acceptable if it averts the criminal from repeating his crime or if it discourages the other would-be criminals. While if seen from a retributive point of view criminals capital punishment is necessary to achieve justice and the criminal should be harmed the same way he damages someone else."
Abstract This paper puts forward the argument that the death penalty is unjust and unconstitutional. It attempts to reason how the death penalty is a cruel and unusual punishment that goes against the guarantee of due process of law by showing that it violates natural law, is simply inhumane, and does not serve as a deterrent to crime. In particular, it explains how the New Jersey capitalpunishment system works, as well as the process of capitalpunishment in detail from court to death. It also proposes potential solutions to resolve the injustice.
From the Paper "The process of capital punishment is very unique in its own manner. It first begins with a jury selection and death qualification. The questioning of potential jurors or voir dire can take a particularly long time in a capital case. Death qualification occurs as well and that is when perspective jurors are questioned on their position on the death penalty for a guilty party (Costanzo 23-24). If a potential juror expresses an inability to inflict a death sentence upon a guilty party, they will be eliminated from the jury. After undergoing studies, it has been shown that due to this death qualification process, the jury that is left to serve is more set to believe that the defendant is guilty and deserves capital punishment."
Abstract A personal analysis of the importance of capitalpunishment for the prevention of future murders. The author provides information on capitalpunishment, its history and public opinion on the subject to support his argument.
From the Paper "When someone has raped and murdered a child, that person has relinquished his right to live. The reason I favor capital punishment is because I have so much regard for human life. Murder is the most terrible crime there is. Anything less than the death penalty is an insult to the victim and society. It says, in effect that we do not value the victim's life enough to punish the killer fully. How many criminals have been let out of prison only to go on killing, raping, and stealing? Why should we allow criminals to harm innocent children, women, and men? No one can deny that the execution of a murderer is a horrible spectacle. But we must not forget that murder is more horrible. The penalty should be exacted only after the guilt is established beyond the shadow of a doubt and only for willful, premeditated murder. But the law of capital punishment must stand, no matter how often a criminal begs for mercy. After all, the victim did not receive mercy. Words are not enough to show that life is sacred. Active justice must be administered when the sacredness of life is violated."
Tags: justice, law, punish, death, crime, kill, moral, society
