Abstract
This paper analyzes Vincent Bugliosi's "Outrage," who recounts and attacks all the problems and mistakes he believes were made in the trial of OJ Simpson, and the reasons why Simpson was not convicted for the murder of his ex-wife and her boyfriend.

From the Paper
"Author Vincent Bugliosi states that O.J. Simpson's acquittal is one of the most gross cases of injustice in the history of the legal system. He claims that O.J. walked not because he is innocent of the murders, but rather, that the circumstances surrounding the evidence, the weak and flawed case presented by the prosecution, the legal gaffs made my Judge Lance Ito, and that pertinent and damaging evidence was left out of the court proceedings all contributed to Simpson's verdict of innocent. The result is that O.J. "walked." "

Tags:justice, outrage, Christopher, Reeve, Simpson, Ito

Abstract
This paper presents the OJ Simpson Case with reference to the role of media in promoting the racial issue of the societal values.

Tags:oj, simpson, media

From the Paper
" The Simpson trial still reverberates in American society, more than two years after a jury acquitted the former football star. The loudest echoes surround the Los Angeles Police Department, which endured withering criticism before, during, and after the legal proceedings. Alas, casual observers would have to be excused for thinking that the LAPD was actually on trial. The defense served notice in opening statements, declaring the evidence "contaminated, compromised, and ultimately compromised" (Los Angeles Times, January 31, 1995, A1). Their closing argument went even further, accusing the police of criminal misconduct in orchestrating a massive frame-up of Simpson (Los Angeles Times, September 29, 1995, A27). Was this the usual hyperbole of a criminal defense lawyer, or did the LAPD really deserve such condemnation? This paper will attempt to answer.."

Abstract
This paper analyzes and examines the multitude of issues related to the O.J. Simpson criminal trial. Part II discusses the evidence procedures that should have been followed in the O.J. Simpson criminal trial. In Part III, the evidence errors made in the O.J. Simpson criminal trial and their impact on the outcome are outlined. Lastly, this paper concludes with recommendations for improving the handling of vital evidence in criminal trials.

From the Paper
"Law is one of the most complex and powerful things in society. Unlike most things that have a minimal impact on most individuals, law impacts everyone's life and provides set guidelines for proper behavior while punishing those who violate such guidelines. What makes law particularly unique is that cases have the ability to establish new precedent that may drastically alter societal norms (i.e., Roe v. Wade and its impact on womens' right to choose). The O.J. Simpson criminal trial was dubbed "The Trial of the Century," complete with a "Dream Team" of lawyers for O.J. Simpson, an ex-Heisman trophy winner and B rate actor who was accused of murdering his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Besides the notoriety of the accused murderer (news and television crews swamped the courtroom), this case was unusual both in its ultimate outcome (O.J. Simpson was found not guilty) as well as in the application of the law."

Tags:law, television, criminal, jury, examination, attorney, police, court

Abstract
This paper that covers the trial of OJ Simpson

From the Paper
"O. J. SIMPSON CRIMINAL TRIAL: EXPLAINING THE VERDICT
This research attempts to explain why O. J. Simpson's criminal trial for the murder of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goodman ended in a verdict of "not guilty," while the civil trial, O. J. Simpson was found responsible for causing the wrongful death of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goodman. To the extent possible, this explanation is couched in concepts from social psychology. Within this context, it is hypothesized that variations in the outcomes of the criminal and civil trials involving the deaths of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman was a function of the social psychological concept of social identity in relation to the jurors of the two trials.

Social identity is defined as the individual's knowledge of personal membership in specific social groupings, together with the .."

Abstract
A book report and analysis of Thomas R. Marshall's "Public Opinion and the Supreme Court". The book itself concerns the influence of public opinion, the media, and interest groups on the decisions handed down by the Court, and vice versa. The conclusion points out that the influence of the public has grown (or the Court's has diminished) in the wake of the OJ Simpson trial.

Tags:public, opinion, supreme

Abstract
The paper discusses the O.J. Simpson murder trial in terms of ethics, racism, authority, egoism and lying.

From the Paper
"On June ..., Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were fatally stabbed outside of Brown's condominium in the Brentwood area of Los Angeles, California. Simpson has been divorced from O.J. Simpson two years earlier and evidence collected at the scene strongly suggested that O.J. Simpson was the killer. (Reske) In "People v. O.J. Simpson", a predominantly black female jury deliberated for three hours after a trial that lasted for days. Simpson was found..."

Tags:O.J. Simpson, racism, ethics

Abstract
This paper explores the impact of the O.J. Simpson trial on law enforcement in the United Sates.

Abstract
This ten-page undergraduate paper examines and analyzes the O. J. Simpson criminal and civil trials of 1995 and 1997 and discusses the interactive nature of the relationship between the media and the audience, and the social changes that resulted.